PDA

View Full Version : Diet, excercise take off equal pounds, study finds


Kaia
01-29-2007, 02:18 PM
Diet, exercise take off equal pounds, study finds

By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor Fri Jan 26, 10:13 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Eating less and exercising more are equally good at helping take off the pounds, U.S. researchers said on Friday in a study that challenges many of the popular tenets of the multibillion dollar diet and fitness industry.

Tests on overweight people show that a calorie is just a calorie, whether lost by dieting or by running, they said.

They found there is no way to selectively lose belly fat, for instance, or trim thighs. And their carefully controlled study added to evidence that adding muscle mass does not somehow boost metabolism and help dieters take off even more weight.

"It's all about the calories," said Dr. Eric Ravussin of the Pennington Biomedical Research Center, part of Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge.

"So long as the energy deficit is the same, body weight, fat weight, and abdominal fat will all decrease in the same way."

Ravussin said the study, published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, is one of the few done under controlled conditions that can actually demonstrate what happens to a human body while dieting and exercising.

Ravussin's team has been testing volunteers for another reason -- to see if taking in fewer calories helps people live longer. Strict diets have been shown to help animals from worms to dogs live longer, but it takes longer to study monkeys and humans.

They tested 24 people, 12 who ate a calorie-restricted diet, and 12 who dieted and also exercised five times a week for six months.

The dieters ate 25 percent less than normal, while the exercisers reduced their calorie intake by 12.5 percent and increased their physical activity to lose an extra 12.5 percent in calories.

Another 10 volunteers acted as controls. All food was provided by the university in carefully measured portions for most of the study.

The volunteers in both groups lost about 10 percent of their body weight, 24 percent of their fat mass, and 27 percent of their abdominal visceral fat. Visceral fat is packed in between the internal organs and is considered the most dangerous type of fat, linked with heart disease and diabetes.

The distribution of the fat on the body was not altered by either approach -- helping prove that there is no such thing as "spot reducing," Ravussin said in a telephone interview.

This suggests that "individuals are genetically programmed for fat storage in a particular pattern and that this programming cannot easily be overcome," he added.

Ravussin has published other studies that also dispute the idea that exercise builds muscle that helps people lose weight.

"If anything, highly trained people are highly efficient, so they burn fewer calories at rest," Ravussin said.

Dieting alone also did not appear to cause the volunteers to lose muscle mass along with fat, Ravussin's team found.

"There is a concept that if you exercise, you are going to lose less of your muscle," he said. But his team found no evidence this is true.

Ravussin believes exercise is crucial to health, however.

"For overall health, an appropriate program of diet and exercise is still the best," he said.

His team found some small suggestion that cutting 25 percent of calories by either diet or diet and exercise might extend life.

"We found that 2 of the biomarkers of aging were improved -- core temperature was 0.4 to 0.5 degrees C less," he said. "Insulin, which has been shown to be a biomarker of aging, was reduced," Ravussin said. That finding was published in the
Journal of the American Medical Association last April.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070126/hl_nm/diet_exercise_dc

Interesting.

mlschop
01-29-2007, 02:19 PM
I read this today. This is just one study. Tomorrow there will be 5 more disputing this fact. I hate reading these things sometimes.

_BullDog_
01-29-2007, 02:20 PM
so if you eat less calories that is = burning off more calories..... these guys are geniuses.

mlschop
01-29-2007, 02:28 PM
so if you eat less calories that is = burning off more calories..... these guys are geniuses.

You're missing the point.

There was always a school of thought that said:

Eat 300 less calories < Eat 150 less calories + burn off 150 calories via exercise (that is, long term, the RHS equation prevails in the game of weight loss).

This study is saying that is not the case, and both sides of the equation will produce the similar results.

Maine-iac
01-29-2007, 02:28 PM
Well, I would not dispute that you can take weight off via diet alone as well as via a diet/exercise combo. Anything will work, as long as Calories Burned > Calories Consumed.

However, I have also seen studies indicating that those who pursue the diet/exercise combo are more likely to maintain a weight loss than those who lost the weight via diet alone. Now I HATE exercise, but from long, sad experience, I have come to agree with that, too. If I don't exercise, I WILL backslide and gain the weight back.

_BullDog_
01-29-2007, 02:29 PM
You're missing the point.

There was always a school of thought that said:

Eat 300 less calories < Eat 150 less calories + burn off 150 calories via exercise (that is, long term, the RHS equation prevails in the game of weight loss).

This study is saying that is not the case, and both sides of the equation will produce the similar results.

Never heard that school of thought....

Abnormal
01-29-2007, 02:33 PM
calories consumed = calories burned + calories stored

So common sense would say that burning calories via exercise is identical to not consuming them. However, since exercise tends to raise your resting metabolism and since muscle (developed via exercise) uses more calories at rest than fat does, it also seems reasonable to combine the two.

mlschop
01-29-2007, 02:38 PM
calories consumed = calories burned + calories stored

So common sense would say that burning calories via exercise is identical to not consuming them. However, since exercise tends to raise your resting metabolism and since muscle (developed via exercise) uses more calories at rest than fat does, it also seems reasonable to combine the two.

I believe that's what this study is disputing...

ajstudies
01-29-2007, 02:40 PM
All I can say is, they didn't test me.

How can they extend a study of 24 people to the entire population?

I would like to volunteer for the study, just to prove it's not that simple.

mlschop
01-29-2007, 02:42 PM
All I can say is, they didn't test me.

How can they extend a study of 24 people to the entire population?

I would like to volunteer for the study, just to prove it's not that simple.

I totally agree; which is why I think this is just a small research group that wanted to get their name in the paper. Since weight-loss is a big problem in this country, coming out with a "shocking" and "contraditory" study is a quick and fast way to get your name out there.