View Full Version : Michael Savaga: Obama and Rahm To Have Their Version of Reichstag Fire
Rickson
04-03-2009, 07:21 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMfZ7czIIWY&eurl=http%3A%2F%2F74%2E125%2E95%2E132%2Fsearch%3Fq %3Dcache%3AVgeY1dB9pk8J%3Awww%2Esalvationanointed% 2Ecom%2F2009%2F03%2Fmichael%2Dsavage%2Dweiner%2Dpr edicts%2Ehtml&feature=player_embedded
Obama is quickly losing all hope and credibility so what will they do? They will pull off a false flag to pull the suckers back in to rally around the flag. If this doesn’t work it will be used as an excuse to ratchet up the martial law from it’s current soft state to boots smashing skulls.
HA HA HA, all my 'wacko theories' are now mainstream news. How is my crown coming along? No worthless diamonds...ruby, saphires, emeralds, etc. only!
[paraphrased for those w/o Youtube]
Very soon Obama will create a crisis like the Reichtag fire, I don’t know what form it will take but once the minion are seen for what they are, Rahm and his gang will set off a Reichtag fire of some kind and they will recall the military dictatorship of Lincoln where civilian suspects were arrested w/o warrant. I fear that every night as I go to sleep. These gangsters have suddenly seized the most powerful army and economy.
[/paraphrased for those w/o Youtube]
cubedbee
04-03-2009, 07:31 AM
You forgot the key part of the video: "If you think I'm making this up, you're right, I'm making this up"
soyleche
04-03-2009, 07:36 AM
HA HA HA, all my 'wacko theories' are now mainstream news.
Michael Savage = mainstream news????
Gary Wright
04-03-2009, 07:58 AM
I love michael savage, he's the one exception for me to the "can't stand talk radio", because he's actually entertaining.
He's also about 6x more intelligent than the middle-of-the-day talk radio guys.
I don't listen to him often, only if I happen to be in the car at 8pm or something and the wife isn't paying attention and I can hijack the radio, but I still find him entertaining every chance I get to listen.
soyleche
04-03-2009, 09:24 AM
I love michael savage, he's the one exception for me to the "can't stand talk radio", because he's actually entertaining.
He's also about 6x more intelligent than the middle-of-the-day talk radio guys.
I don't listen to him often, only if I happen to be in the car at 8pm or something and the wife isn't paying attention and I can hijack the radio, but I still find him entertaining every chance I get to listen.
I kinda enjoy listening to him as well - I'm not sure I would consider him "mainstream news" though.
Oh, and about the bolded part - I know that must be true, because he spends about 70% of each of his shows telling us that it's true. I think he pats himself on the back about his intelligence even more than Rush does.
Gary Wright
04-03-2009, 09:31 AM
I kinda enjoy listening to him as well - I'm not sure I would consider him "mainstream news" though.
Oh, and about the bolded part - I know that must be true, because he spends about 70% of each of his shows telling us that it's true. I think he pats himself on the back about his intelligence even more than Rush does.
I don't base that on how smart he tells us he is, I base it on his ability to actually discuss something and get into the details vs. Rush, Hannity, Glenn Beck and all of those other narrow-witted folks who just repeat whatever they're saying over and over and then hang up on callers who are beating them up in an argument.
Last Train to Skaville
04-03-2009, 09:32 AM
I kinda enjoy listening to him as well - I'm not sure I would consider him "mainstream news" though.
Oh, and about the bolded part - I know that must be true, because he spends about 70% of each of his shows telling us that it's true. I think he pats himself on the back about his intelligence even more than Rush does.
I like listening to him too. But I would NEVER consider him as a source of news, mainstream or otherwise.
soyleche
04-03-2009, 09:45 AM
I don't base that on how smart he tells us he is, I base it on his ability to actually discuss something and get into the details vs. Rush, Hannity, Glenn Beck and all of those other narrow-witted folks who just repeat whatever they're saying over and over and then hang up on callers who are beating them up in an argument.
Yeah - I know. It is annoying to have to hear him tell you again how many doctorate degrees he has though.
I agree with you on Hannity - I used to like to listen to him, but he got boring real fast. Never listened to Rush much, but what's I've heard I haven't cared for much. Same with Beck, although he is at least entertaining.
The one I've heard and like the most is Neal Boortz. He's not carried on any of the stations in my new city though :(
Don McCain
04-03-2009, 09:52 AM
Yeah - I know. It is annoying to have to hear him tell you again how many doctorate degrees he has though.
I agree with you on Hannity - I used to like to listen to him, but he got boring real fast. Never listened to Rush much, but what's I've heard I haven't cared for much. Same with Beck, although he is at least entertaining.
The one I've heard and like the most is Neal Boortz. He's not carried on any of the stations in my new city though :(
Neal is good, but he will hang up on you whenever he's wrong.
...HA HA HA, all my 'wacko theories' are now mainstream news...Michael Savage is mainstream news?
I'm still waiting for H. Clinton to win the 2008 presidential election.
Gary Wright
04-03-2009, 09:57 AM
Yeah - I know. It is annoying to have to hear him tell you again how many doctorate degrees he has though.
I agree with you on Hannity - I used to like to listen to him, but he got boring real fast. Never listened to Rush much, but what's I've heard I haven't cared for much. Same with Beck, although he is at least entertaining.
The one I've heard and like the most is Neal Boortz. He's not carried on any of the stations in my new city though :(
WSB AM carries Boortz right before Clark Howard. Sometimes when I tune in for CH early in the afternoon, I catch 15 minutes of Boortz. I can tolerate him.
If you go to clarkhoward.com and click on listen live, you'll get whatever is on WSB at that time - it doesn't limit you to only being able to listen when Clark's show is on.
soyleche
04-03-2009, 10:06 AM
If you go to clarkhoward.com and click on listen live, you'll get whatever is on WSB at that time - it doesn't limit you to only being able to listen when Clark's show is on.
Yeah - I've done that at times. The firewall at work makes that a bit difficult though...
Guilty Bystander
04-03-2009, 10:27 AM
I think a Reichstag fire is plausible. One way they could accomplish it is to ignore security memos about impending attacks on American soil. It's been done successfully before, so we know the tactic is sound.
;)
I'm amused at this speculation towards the move to dictatorship when the president’s actions have been contrary to that. Simply look at the DOJ.
Obama ordered the DOJ to review all of Bush the 43rds notoriously undemocratic signing statements. Obama indicated that he would rarely use signing statements. A step forward, though I was very disappointed that he refused to pledge never to use them.
Look at the Sen. Stevens case. It's clear that Stevens is as guilty as sin but when it became clear to Holder that there was severe prosecutorial misconduct he dropped the case showing respect for the rule of law.
There are no John Yoo's in the Obama administration.
Don McCain
04-03-2009, 11:05 AM
I'm amused at this speculation towards the move to dictatorship when the president’s actions have been contrary to that. Simply look at the DOJ.
Obama ordered the DOJ to review all of Bush the 43rds notoriously undemocratic signing statements. Obama indicated that he would rarely use signing statements. A step forward, though I was very disappointed that he refused to pledge never to use them.
Look at the Sen. Stevens case. It's clear that Stevens is as guilty as sin but when it became clear to Holder that there was severe prosecutorial misconduct he dropped the case showing respect for the rule of law.
There are no John Yoo's in the Obama administration.
Stop it with the facts!!
Harry
04-03-2009, 11:41 AM
Michael Savage = mainstream news????
Yeah, that was my first question.
Harry
04-03-2009, 11:43 AM
Michael Savage is a Weiner.
wally world
04-03-2009, 11:48 AM
I find Michael Savage somewhat entertaining, but definitely not mainstream. I prefer Michael Medved's show to Savage.
Gary Wright
04-03-2009, 12:28 PM
I think only one person so far has said that MS is mainstream. We can stop debating that, it's worthless posts.
Gary Wright
04-03-2009, 12:28 PM
Michael Savage is a Weiner.
He might be a Weiner, but is he a wiener?
Gary Wright
04-03-2009, 12:29 PM
Obama ordered the DOJ to review all of Bush the 43rds notoriously undemocratic signing statements. Obama indicated that he would rarely use signing statements. A step forward, though I was very disappointed that he refused to pledge never to use them.
Didn't he just load a bill that he signed with signing statements?
The Obama Signing Statement
Two days after instructing the government to ignore President’s Bush’s signing statements, Obama has issued one of his own. In the statement—a direction to executive branch officials about how to implement the legislation—he reserves the right to bypass dozens of disputed provisions in the $410 billion omnibus spending bill. Obama writes that a provision instructing money not to be spent on any UN peacekeeping mission if it means putting US troops under a foreign commander “raises constitutional concerns by constraining my choice of particular persons to perform specific command functions in military missions.” He also takes on whistle-blower protections for federal employees; negotiations with other countries; what agencies should include in budget requests; and allowing money to be reallocated to a different program only with the approval of a congressional committee (an “impermissible forms of legislative aggrandizement”).
Read it at The New York Times
I already know what the next comment is going to be from the TOTUS lickers.
Guerilla poster
04-03-2009, 12:57 PM
Didn't he just load a bill that he signed with signing statements?
I already know what the next comment is going to be from the TOTUS lickers.
One man's TOTUS licker is another man's environmentally sound toilet paper?
Gary Wright
04-03-2009, 01:04 PM
Works for me. Does this mean we're wiping our rears with Obama supporters or something?
Guerilla poster
04-03-2009, 01:14 PM
Works for me. Does this mean we're wiping our rears with Obama supporters or something?
We don't want to turn white shirts into brown shirts, do we? +
Descalzo
04-03-2009, 05:19 PM
I think only one person so far has said that MS is mainstream. We can stop debating that, it's worthless posts.
I agree! No more worthless posts.
:judge:
Dr T Non-Fan
04-03-2009, 05:54 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMfZ7czIIWY&eurl=http%3A%2F%2F74%2E125%2E95%2E132%2Fsearch%3Fq %3Dcache%3AVgeY1dB9pk8J%3Awww%2Esalvationanointed% 2Ecom%2F2009%2F03%2Fmichael%2Dsavage%2Dweiner%2Dpr edicts%2Ehtml&feature=player_embedded
Obama is quickly losing all hope and credibility so what will they do? They will pull off a false flag to pull the suckers back in to rally around the flag. If this doesn’t work it will be used as an excuse to ratchet up the martial law from it’s current soft state to boots smashing skulls.
HA HA HA, all my 'wacko theories' are now mainstream news. How is my crown coming along? No worthless diamonds...ruby, saphires, emeralds, etc. only!
[paraphrased for those w/o Youtube]
Very soon Obama will create a crisis like the Reichtag fire, I don’t know what form it will take but once the minion are seen for what they are, Rahm and his gang will set off a Reichtag fire of some kind and they will recall the military dictatorship of Lincoln where civilian suspects were arrested w/o warrant. I fear that every night as I go to sleep. These gangsters have suddenly seized the most powerful army and economy.
[/paraphrased for those w/o Youtube]
Meh. I thought the TFH on Reichstag-Fire-like incidences was that Bush/Chaney were behind 9/11. That didn't work.
2pac Shakur
04-03-2009, 06:07 PM
Meh. I thought the TFH on Reichstag-Fire-like incidences was that Bush/Chaney were behind 9/11. That didn't work.
Bush got re-elected didn't he?
Dr T Non-Fan
04-03-2009, 06:22 PM
Bush got re-elected didn't he?
Yes, but it was against Kerry.
He did not become dictator as is the inference of the Reichstag Fire. Of course, the plane that was supposed to hit the Capitol Building was downed in PA, so we'll never know for sure....<tfh>
2pac Shakur
04-03-2009, 06:36 PM
Yes, but it was against Kerry.
He did not become dictator as is the inference of the Reichstag Fire. Of course, the plane that was supposed to hit the Capitol Building was downed in PA, so we'll never know for sure....<tfh>
He made more money than if he'd become dictator.
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.