allenlod
11-03-2009, 02:11 PM
The question is as follows:
"The following table was calculated based on loss amounts for a group of motorcycle insurance policies:
cj dj uj xj Pj
250 6 0 1 0
500 6 0 2 5
1000 7 1 4 9
2750 0 1 7 11
5500 0 1 1 3
6000 0 0 1 1
10,000 0 0 0 0
You are given α= 1 and β= 0.
Using the procedure in the Loss Models text, estimate the probability that a policy with a deductible of 500 will have a claim payment in excess of 5500."
The solution computed S(500) by taking the Kaplan-Meier estimate at the 250 deductible line but not including the 500 deductible line. I had 3 questions:
1. Why wasn't the information at the 500 line incorporated in calculating S(500)?
2. Is there a way to word the question differently so that the information at the 500 line would be included?
3. If I faced a similar situation with a Nelson-Aalen equivalent, would this still be the case?
Thanks in advance.
"The following table was calculated based on loss amounts for a group of motorcycle insurance policies:
cj dj uj xj Pj
250 6 0 1 0
500 6 0 2 5
1000 7 1 4 9
2750 0 1 7 11
5500 0 1 1 3
6000 0 0 1 1
10,000 0 0 0 0
You are given α= 1 and β= 0.
Using the procedure in the Loss Models text, estimate the probability that a policy with a deductible of 500 will have a claim payment in excess of 5500."
The solution computed S(500) by taking the Kaplan-Meier estimate at the 250 deductible line but not including the 500 deductible line. I had 3 questions:
1. Why wasn't the information at the 500 line incorporated in calculating S(500)?
2. Is there a way to word the question differently so that the information at the 500 line would be included?
3. If I faced a similar situation with a Nelson-Aalen equivalent, would this still be the case?
Thanks in advance.