judal

02-26-2012, 12:42 AM

IN PAGE 301 OF WERNER, regarding the loss trend. I thought both trend from and trend to in this example is by PY. Therefore, looking at experience period PY 7/1/03-04, the ave loss date is 7/1/04, and for the trend to period, which is also an annual policy effective 7/1/2009, the ave loss date is 7/1/2010, right?

while in page 301, it said the ave accident date of trend to period is 12/31/2009, similarly, all the trend from period, the ave accident date is 12/31. How come?

also when ever after trending, and you need to apply the LDF, which LDF to use. For example in the above example, for PY 7/1/03-04, after trending for 7/1/2009-2010 period, which LDF you use, how did the example comes up with the LDF of 66 to ultimate?

Thanks in advance.

while in page 301, it said the ave accident date of trend to period is 12/31/2009, similarly, all the trend from period, the ave accident date is 12/31. How come?

also when ever after trending, and you need to apply the LDF, which LDF to use. For example in the above example, for PY 7/1/03-04, after trending for 7/1/2009-2010 period, which LDF you use, how did the example comes up with the LDF of 66 to ultimate?

Thanks in advance.