cmlarson
08-17-2004, 09:53 PM
I definitely get the major points of the 4 methods presented by Stanard but now I am trying to get the fine details. All10 has confused me a bit. Here are my questions:
Method 1:
Stanard says in his paper to use a weighted average of the link ratios but I don't see any mention of how many years. Are we to assume that we should use 3 always the way All10 does?
Method 2 & 3:
The calculation of the Expected Losses is supposed to be based on historical loss development experience. In the All10 manual, on exhibits 6 and 7, the Expected Losses are calculated using years 68-71 only. Is there a reason why 1966 and 1967 are ignored in these calculations? Am I missing something?
Method 4:
It looks like All10 in exhibit 8 is using a simple average of the latest 3 year's % of Premium factors. Is that correct? Should any weights be used?
Method 1:
Stanard says in his paper to use a weighted average of the link ratios but I don't see any mention of how many years. Are we to assume that we should use 3 always the way All10 does?
Method 2 & 3:
The calculation of the Expected Losses is supposed to be based on historical loss development experience. In the All10 manual, on exhibits 6 and 7, the Expected Losses are calculated using years 68-71 only. Is there a reason why 1966 and 1967 are ignored in these calculations? Am I missing something?
Method 4:
It looks like All10 in exhibit 8 is using a simple average of the latest 3 year's % of Premium factors. Is that correct? Should any weights be used?