PDA

View Full Version : AndyBert makes challenges to me, fruitless...


Andy Lang
05-19-2002, 01:48 PM
A post by me to a wise-guy in the SOA desert forum, Alberto:

Dear Alberto:

You clearly don't know me, otherwise you might be quaking in your boots, metaphorically, intellectually and actuarially, so to speak.

The Big Four are all failing, as is the notion that life insurance policies and medical care are great deals for the consumer--as Joseph Belth has made it clear for decades now.

All of these are primarily actuarial problems.

Moreover, the Big Four if done right, can help the world move towards democracy as well as saving the retirement security of the planet, while if done wrong--privatization--will create the strong possibility of destroying democracy itself and making slaves of ordinary people, in favor of major multinationals and transnationals. think Enron multiplied times several thousand. Check out Fast Company's May 2002 article, Bad Business: Are All Companies Crooked?

In fact, save only for the use of weapons of mass destruction, there is no larger issue in the world today than SS and medicare and their private counterparts, retiree medical systems and defined benefit pension plans.

The first three are not even actuarially sound systems, lacking two of the three basic components for all DB plans; actuarial advance funding and laws with teeth to protect the plan participants, while the last one, DB pension plans in private industry has all three, but alas, the last component, laws, have been subverted to benefit the plan sponsor and all too often screw the employees.

So print out this message and tack it to your wall and, repeat it three hundred times every day until you memorize it, and you will have more wisdom and knowledge than most of the actuaries on this board.

Politeness, BTW is vastly overrated. Truth is vastly underrated. Both especially here.

I spoke to AndyBert the other day and here is what he said:

Me: "The world is going to hell in a hand basket. My question is how can you classify people as to why this might be happening? After all, you created this mess."

AndyBert: "There are three kinds of humans in the world; those who like to give orders; those who like to take them; and those who like to break them."

Me: "So what?"

AndyBert: "The last group are the ones from which great breakthroughs occur--you know, trial ands error, experimentation. It's the basis for all movement forward--and sometime backward too. It's the basis for what you humans call, evolution and it also drives the inorganic universe as well."

Me: "And...?"

AndyBert: "So right now, the pace of change is so great that the first two are in major supply while the later are in short supply. They might catch up, but right now it doesn't look good."

Me: "And how about my profession?"

AndyBert: "The ones who break the rules are nearly nonexistent--the result of a century of managed human-made evolution within your profession, with propagation of your species being made totally dependent on money."

Me: "As opposed to...?"

AndyBert: "Doing what is right for the workers, dummy. Didn't Christ tell you, do unto others as..."

Me: "But how do you make money and eat in the meantime?"

AndyBert: "Easy, eat the bad guys. There are plenty of people who need actuaries to help them recover money lost and to repair things like Social Security. The world, what you call the 'developed' world, a misnomer if ever there was one, are all getting older you know. Competition is how the world moves forward and destroy it and you destroy the world. I set it up that way."

Me: "But how do we go about doing this...!!??"

AndyBert: " Come on, I have already told you plenty. If I told you any more, you wouldn't have free will and your brain would atrophy and then the whole thing doesn't work..."

Me: "But, but..."

But then he was gone.

Intents
05-20-2002, 02:50 PM
epilogue ...

and I was left to myself to wander the Internet. Yessirree ... breaking those rules is what makes me really distinguished ... especially the one about looking a gift horse in the mouth.

Andy Lang
05-20-2002, 05:13 PM
Hey--you won't have to buy the books...

Don't worry, you won't be any of them. I'm after Whales, not sardines.

Intents
05-21-2002, 09:10 AM
thank you for deciding what I can and cannot do in my life ... please pardon me if I decide for myself whether or not to follow your advice.

It really is too bad that you are so firmly entrenched.

My whole contention with you has been your self-righteous method of self-promotion. Captain Ahab did not end up bringing home Moby Dick. His efforts to ramrod a ship with his personal passion alone ended up a dear price. Sure, he had a heckuva ride, but in the end, it was all about self-gratification, not the desire to rid the world of a deadly menace. In fact, the author indicated that several menacing whales had been done in by the singular passions of driven men.

So, sail on into the sunset with the heads of two whales suspended from a crossbeam on your ship in a mystic attempt to have somebody claim the golden doubloon from your mast giving you the opportunity to slaughter that which you fear, rather than find a way to live in peace and have dominion.

Andy Lang
05-21-2002, 10:20 AM
Now, now, don't get personal, this is just business.

Intents
05-21-2002, 11:24 AM
I am glad to have gotten under your skin a bit. My goal has been to only get personal to the extent necessary to open your eyes to the hurtful way you attack fellow actuaries.

You call it business, I call it a profession. The profession is where the culture of ethics needs to be addressed. By its nature, business does not have an ethics concept unless the business model employed has ethics as a component. Some businesses do and some don't. Our profession will fail if we do not have ethics strong enough to withstand business pressures. I know you and I are on agreement on this. I also know we are both in agreement that the basic funding for our profession comes from businesses so it may be impossible to have an impartial profession.

The inevitable result will be further restriction of actuarial mathematics by independent outside sources. We seriously diverge when you start blanket attacks on the profession thinking there are only a few who genuinely care about doing things right. In my opinion, we cannot fault fellow really bright colleagues if we have put them in a situation where the temptation to trade integrity for big bucks is so strong.