Some Help on Part 5 Point allocation

[panmess]

Hi all,

I am trying to categorise the papers of part 5 in order of importance with the highest point receivers at the top and the lowest at the bottom. Could some one please provide me with some input on this in the following format.

eg.

1. WC Feldblum (7% of total points)
2. Mclennahan (6% of total points)
3. etc, etc...

Will appreciate your input

Pantelis

[Math1337]

http://www.casact.com/admissions/syllabus/2005/exam5.htm

The syllabus lists percent ranges for different learning objectives, and the papers associated with those learning objectives. With a little work, you can deduce which papers are important, and which aren't. For example, learning objective E8 is worth 3-7 percent, and the only paper for that LO is "Feldblum 1", so that paper is guaranteed 3 percent, at least.

[panmess]

Thanks for the reply, but that still remains a bit vague.

If 5 papers could get between 10 - 12%, its not clear which paper is the one considered the most important.

I was hopping to get a weight per papers from someone that had a bit more info than myself.

I will be going through the last four to five years to get an idea of were the focus is, but it would help to get some idea before I start.

Thx
Pantelis

[Maine-iac]

I believe All 10 provides this info on their website after you purchase the manual.

Just keep in mind that past weighting is not necessarily a good indicator of future weighting.