8V -- SN 110 (equity/duration paradox)

[Axsuetarian]

Is it sufficient to say that the assumption of constant growth gives the DDM and FFM models the same result (just arrived at differently)

Put another way, is it true that

FV = FF*G*E becomes (r-k)/(rk) * g/(k-g) * E simply with the assumption of constant growth

Thanks in advance,