Examinator
09-16-2005, 03:36 PM
I'm pulling this from paragraph 40 of FASB No. 60, but it's appeared in at least two other tests (maybe No. 113?).
If a reinsurance contract (or, To the extent a reinsurance contract) does not provide for indemnification of the ceding enterprise against loss or liability, the premium paid less the premium to be retained by the reinsurer shall be accounted for as a deposit by the decing enterprise. As a result from such a contract, a net credit shall be reported as a liability by the ceding enterprise, and a net charge shall be reported as an asset by the reinsurer.
I don't really know what this is saying.
I assume the reinsurance contract is failing to provide protection (at least to an extent) because there isn't sufficient insurance risk (underwriting or timing). Is that correct?
Also, what exactly is this amount? Premium paid [to the reinsurer?] less what is retained by the reinsurer seems to be ceding commission. Are any ceded losses figured into this? How does this translate into the liability for the cedant at the end?
If a reinsurance contract (or, To the extent a reinsurance contract) does not provide for indemnification of the ceding enterprise against loss or liability, the premium paid less the premium to be retained by the reinsurer shall be accounted for as a deposit by the decing enterprise. As a result from such a contract, a net credit shall be reported as a liability by the ceding enterprise, and a net charge shall be reported as an asset by the reinsurer.
I don't really know what this is saying.
I assume the reinsurance contract is failing to provide protection (at least to an extent) because there isn't sufficient insurance risk (underwriting or timing). Is that correct?
Also, what exactly is this amount? Premium paid [to the reinsurer?] less what is retained by the reinsurer seems to be ceding commission. Are any ceded losses figured into this? How does this translate into the liability for the cedant at the end?