Actuarial Outpost
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Blogs > Marid Audran
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Browse Open Actuarial Jobs

Life  Health  Casualty  Pension  Entry Level  All Jobs  Salaries

Rate this Entry

Why a European call option (no div.) costs more than spot minus strike

Posted 12-29-2008 at 12:52 AM by Marid Audran

I think the discussion and formula derivations in McDonald (pp. 294-95) are not as simple as they could be.*

"Spot minus strike" is the same thing as "exercise value," in the case of an American option. But I want to focus on European options, about which put-call parity says

C - P = PV(F) - PV(K).

The assumption of no dividends implies PV(F)=S, today's spot price. Applying this equality and adding P to both sides yields

C = S - PV(K) + P >= S - PV(K) > S - K.

The inequality C >= S-PV(K) is what is illustrated in Table 9.4 in the textbook. The inequality C>S-K is Formula 9.11.

* With that said, the breakdown in Formula 9.11 for a European option,

Call price = (Exercise value) plus (the insurance of a "put") plus (time value of money on strike price),

seems important. Furthermore, in discussing American options at the top of P. 296, McDonald writes:

That is, if interest on the strike price (which induces us to delay exercise) exceeds the present value of dividends (which induces us to exercise), then we will for certain never early-exercise at that time.
This seems especially important, as well as being related to the "time value of money" term in Formula 9.11. I need to think about it more.
Posted in Exams, MFE-3F
Views 2581 Comments 0
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 0



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.18050 seconds with 15 queries