View Single Post
Old 11-28-2016, 06:37 PM
campbell's Avatar
campbell campbell is offline
Mary Pat Campbell
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Studying for duolingo and coursera
Favorite beer: Murphy's Irish Stout
Posts: 87,047
Blog Entries: 6

Is It Simpler Than Obamacare? California’s Retirement Mandate
The giant state and four others aim to use employers to revolutionize saving for millions of workers.

The last time millions of Americans were signed up for a new government-mandated benefit program, it didn’t go so well. The initial rollout of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, resulted in broken websites, angry employers, and lots of confused consumers.

Now five states, where one in five Americans lives, are attempting a similar feat, this time with retirement. The goal in California, Oregon, Illinois, Maryland, and Connecticut over the next few years is to give nearly every worker the chance to save for retirement at work.
Currently, 36 percent of U.S. private-sector workers don’t have access to a pension or 401(k)-style plan on the job, according to the Pew Charitable Trusts. Even those who have a plan at work don’t always find it easy to sign up. As a result, 55 percent of workers aren’t saving for retirement at work. Young workers and Latinos are the least likely to have access to workplace retirement options.

The states are trying to get more workers saving for retirement by requiring employers either to offer a plan to workers or to connect them to a portable, state-run retirement option.

“It is an ambitious step that is part of a growing national movement aimed at protecting millions of Americans who are on track to retire into poverty,” California State Controller Betty Yee said in a speech earlier this month.

Almost 7 million people could end up enrolled in the California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program, the state estimates. All employers with five or more workers would eventually need to comply.

It won’t be easy to set up such a program, Yee and other state officials acknowledge. “Other states will be watching closely,” Yee said, “and we are going to succeed. I’m confident of that.”
It’s no coincidence that all five of the states preparing retirement mandates are heavily Democratic. Business and financial industry groups, which usually support Republicans on such issues, aren’t nearly as enthusiastic about the proposals. The Investment Company Institute, a trade group for fund companies, opposed the California plan, saying it opened up the state to legal and financial risks. The California Chamber of Commerce initially opposed Secure Choice as well.
Big questions still face the five state plans. Will fees be sufficient to cover the plans’ costs without using taxpayer money? Will the employer mandate prompt more companies to set up their own retirement plans, rather than link workers to the state system? That might be good for workers, especially if increased competition improves the often-inadequate 401(k) options for small businesses but might rob the state systems of fee-paying participants.

Finally, will workers actually save in the accounts, which are voluntary? Even if they’re able to save, what’s to prevent low- and middle-income workers from raiding their accounts during financial emergencies, compromising their retirements?

LinkedIn Profile
Reply With Quote
Page generated in 0.12246 seconds with 9 queries