View Single Post
  #11  
Old 01-15-2019, 09:37 PM
urbjhawk urbjhawk is offline
SOA
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Studying for LTAM
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gandalf View Post
If you stop and think about it, you're asking a rather silly question. Fractional age assumptions are for the pattern of mortality between integral ages. So they tell you how to get (for example) mu_50.2 from q50. They wouldn't tell you how to get mu_51.2 (that's 50+1.2) from q50, because that's not in the year starting with age 50.

You could say mu_(50+1.2)=mu_(51.2)=mu_(51+.2) and then evaluate it under udd by the formula you already gave as q_51/(1-.2*q_51).
Indeed it was, it has been a long day. Thanks for clearing up my confusion.
__________________
VEE's P FM SRM IFM STAM LTAM PA
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.11029 seconds with 9 queries