View Single Post
Old 12-03-2017, 08:50 AM
campbell's Avatar
campbell campbell is offline
Mary Pat Campbell
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Studying for duolingo and coursera
Favorite beer: Murphy's Irish Stout
Posts: 86,600
Blog Entries: 6

What got through the Senate:

Senate Passes Tax Bill That Includes Scott Life Amendments
Corker was the only Republican to vote against H.R. 1
Members of the Senate today voted 49-51 to approve their version of H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act bill, along a mostly party-line vote.

All Democrats and independents who participated voted against the bill.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., was the only Republican to vote in favor of the bill.

The legislation the Senate actually approved appears to be a 479-page substitute amendment released late Friday by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. A copy of the Hatch amendment is available here.

Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, introduced one version of H.R. 1 in the House in early November. The House has already approved that version.

Hatch, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, posted a Senate version about a week later. When the committee was marking up the original Hatch version of the bill, the committee also posted a packet proposed by committee members.

Life and Annuities

The original Brady and Hatch versions of the bill included a number of changes related to life insurance that received little public attention.

The Brady bill, for example, would have let life insurers keep only 76.5% of their statutory reserves as tax reserves. Analysts at the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimated that change would have resulted in a gain for the federal government of about $15 billion over 10 years, or costs of about $1.5 billion per year for life insurers.

Tax bill (Image: Hatch)

(Image: Hatch)

The original Brady bill also would have changed how life insurers account for "deferred acquisition cost" (DAC) expenses, or the spending associated with bringing in new life and annuity business, such as marketing, underwriting, and paying agent sales commissions.

The original Hatch bill also included a DAC tax provision.

The JCT analysts predicted the Brady DAC provision would cost life insurers about $7 billion over 10 years, and that the original Hatch version would have cost about $23 billion over 10 years.

When the Senate Finance Committee was holding the bill markup meetings, Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., offered a package of life insurance section amendment proposals. The committee included the Scott proposal in the amendment packet but never discussed it during the markup.

The substitute amendment that Hatch posted today appears to include most of what Scott asked for.

Scott asked, for example, that tax bill managers extend the amortization period for DAC expenses to 15 years, from 10, and increase the DAC tax capitalization rates for new business by 20%.

Scott also asked the tax bill managers to let life insurers treat 95% of their statutory reserves as tax reserves, rather than 76.5%. The Hatch substitute amendment sets the tax reserve percentage at 92.87%.

The Hatch substitute amendment appears to keep a life settlement provision from the original Hatch bill. The life settlement provision will create new tax reporting requirements for life settlement transactions, and it will keep the life settlement providers from treating the cost of life insurance premiums as an expense when computing capital gains taxes.

The Future

The Senate and the House still have to resolve differences between their bills before a bill can go to the desk of President Donald Trump.

The House could simply approve the Senate version of H.R. 1, but congressional leaders have said they intend to set up a conference committee to try to combine the two bills.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said in a tweet that he decided to vote for the bill partly because he was told he could have a seat at the conference committee table.

So we have to wait to see what actually gets signed.

LinkedIn Profile
Reply With Quote
Page generated in 0.11018 seconds with 9 queries