Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Life
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

US HEALTH ACTUARIAL JOBS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-29-2008, 02:32 PM
JMO's Avatar
JMO JMO is offline
Carol Marler
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Back home again in Indiana
Studying for CPD
Posts: 29,677
Default Tax Definition of a Life Insurance Company

Under IRS rules, deficiency reserves are not deductible. However, are these non-deductible reserves still counted as "life insurance reserves" in determining whether or not a company qualifies as a life insurance company for tax purposes?
__________________
Carol Marler, FSA, MAAA, A Dedicated Actuary
Just My Opinion (Although this statement is my opinion, and I am an actuary, it's still not a statement of actuarial opinion, and you really shouldn't rely on it.)

Updated quotes June 10:
Spoiler:
A comment letter by Adam Williams regarding US Qualification Standards, "In general, do not make the qualification standard more complicated, but where possible, make it more simple."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Vercetti View Post
Someone really needs to patent the patent process. So no one else can file a new patent any more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Kade View Post
Actuaries (as a general rule) are uniquely UNqualified to work with derivatives.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan View Post
learning what the data are, what they mean, why they are plural, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-29-2008, 02:52 PM
Steve Grondin Steve Grondin is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,630
Default

No.

In order for a insurance company to be a life insurance company, (as oppposed to a non-life insurance company) more than 1/2 of its total reserves (which don't include def res because of 816(h)) must be life insurance reserves (which don't include def res because of 816(h)) plus unearned premiums and unpaid losses of guar ren and noncan health contracts.

See US Tax Reserves For Life Insurers (Robbins & Bush) Chapter 3 and IRC sec 816.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-29-2008, 02:58 PM
JMO's Avatar
JMO JMO is offline
Carol Marler
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Back home again in Indiana
Studying for CPD
Posts: 29,677
Default

I see. Exclude from both the numerator and denominator. Thanks.
__________________
Carol Marler, FSA, MAAA, A Dedicated Actuary
Just My Opinion (Although this statement is my opinion, and I am an actuary, it's still not a statement of actuarial opinion, and you really shouldn't rely on it.)

Updated quotes June 10:
Spoiler:
A comment letter by Adam Williams regarding US Qualification Standards, "In general, do not make the qualification standard more complicated, but where possible, make it more simple."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Vercetti View Post
Someone really needs to patent the patent process. So no one else can file a new patent any more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthur Kade View Post
Actuaries (as a general rule) are uniquely UNqualified to work with derivatives.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan View Post
learning what the data are, what they mean, why they are plural, etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.14254 seconds with 7 queries