Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Non-Actuarial Topics
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson & Company International Actuary Jobs
  Canada  Asia  Australia  Life  Pension  Casualty
Bermuda, United Kingdom, Europe, Asia, Worldwide


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-06-2006, 07:14 PM
John Titor's Avatar
John Titor John Titor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 67
Default More on time travel - anyone interested?

Anyone going to check out this guy? I may be there. Let me know and I will buy you a beer afterwards

http://www.uncg.edu/ure/news/stories...lett013006.htm

Quote:
Dr. Ronald L. Mallett, an African American physicist, will talk about his theory of time travel and his attempt to build a time machine at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 7, in Elliott University Center Auditorium.

When Mallett was 10, his father died of a heart attack. He read H.G. Wells’ “The Time Machine” a few months later and dreamed that time travel would allow him to see his father again.

He received his B.S. in 1969, his M.S. in 1970, and his Ph.D. in 1973, all in physics and all from the Pennsylvania State University.

In 1975, he joined the University of Connecticut at Storrs, where he has been a professor of theoretical physics ever since. He has published numerous papers on black holes and relativistic cosmology in professional journals.

His recent work on time travel has been featured extensively in the media, including New Scientist, the Village Voice, the Boston Globe, Rolling Stone magazine, Pravda (Moscow), The Wall Street Journal, Astronomy Magazine, Japanese television, German television, The Learning Channel, the Science Channel and numerous radio stations.

A memoir about his life as a minority scientist and his original contribution to the science and engineering of time machines is due in bookstores this fall.

This event is co-sponsored by the African American Studies Program and the Department of Physics and Astronomy. For more information on Mallett’s presentation, contact Michael Cauthen in the African American Studies Program at 336-334-4494 or mdcauthe@uncg.edu, or Dr. Steve Danford, head of the physics and astronomy department, at 336-334-3308 or danford@uncg.edu.
__________________
Unfortunately, time travel is not an exact science. There is inherent error and chaos in the computers ability to make accurate calculations. Based on the current technology of the clocks and sensors, distortion units are only accurate to about 60 years or so. So no, in 2036, we are unable to travel back 1000 years due to the error rate in the system. The divergence between the worldline of origin and the target worldline would be too great...I don’t think you would like 2036 very much.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-06-2006, 07:39 PM
Emily Emily is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oakland
Posts: 5,127
Default

It sounds like he has issues.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-06-2006, 07:41 PM
John Titor's Avatar
John Titor John Titor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 67
Default

I bet you do too.
__________________
Unfortunately, time travel is not an exact science. There is inherent error and chaos in the computers ability to make accurate calculations. Based on the current technology of the clocks and sensors, distortion units are only accurate to about 60 years or so. So no, in 2036, we are unable to travel back 1000 years due to the error rate in the system. The divergence between the worldline of origin and the target worldline would be too great...I don’t think you would like 2036 very much.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-06-2006, 07:45 PM
Emily Emily is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oakland
Posts: 5,127
Default

Yes, and that's why no one listens to me when I start talking about time travel as if it were possible.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-06-2006, 08:15 PM
John Titor's Avatar
John Titor John Titor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emily
Yes, and that's why no one listens to me when I start talking about time travel as if it were possible.
12 words too many at the end of that sentence.
__________________
Unfortunately, time travel is not an exact science. There is inherent error and chaos in the computers ability to make accurate calculations. Based on the current technology of the clocks and sensors, distortion units are only accurate to about 60 years or so. So no, in 2036, we are unable to travel back 1000 years due to the error rate in the system. The divergence between the worldline of origin and the target worldline would be too great...I don’t think you would like 2036 very much.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-06-2006, 07:59 PM
Swan's Avatar
Swan Swan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coney Island
Posts: 5,792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Titor
Anyone going to check out this guy? I may be there. Let me know and I will buy you a beer afterwards

http://www.uncg.edu/ure/news/stories...lett013006.htm
I wanna go just so I can be the smartass who, at the end of the lecture, is seen walking out of the auditorium muttering to himself, "Now there's two hours of my life I'll never get back.

"Unless..."
__________________
And now, an excerpt from a post I like to describe as "Lesbianism for Dummies":

Spoiler:
Quote:
Originally Posted by booger View Post
ao fan, place my boobs on your body.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-06-2006, 08:15 PM
John Titor's Avatar
John Titor John Titor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swan
I wanna go just so I can be the smartass who, at the end of the lecture, is seen walking out of the auditorium muttering to himself, "Now there's two hours of my life I'll never get back.

"Unless..."
__________________
Unfortunately, time travel is not an exact science. There is inherent error and chaos in the computers ability to make accurate calculations. Based on the current technology of the clocks and sensors, distortion units are only accurate to about 60 years or so. So no, in 2036, we are unable to travel back 1000 years due to the error rate in the system. The divergence between the worldline of origin and the target worldline would be too great...I don’t think you would like 2036 very much.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-06-2006, 08:44 PM
E. Blackadder's Avatar
E. Blackadder E. Blackadder is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Not far from US 1.
Favorite beer: Beer?! Blech. But Dad likes Dortmunder Union.
Posts: 20,837
Blog Entries: 1
Default Here's what I would be willing to go to...

Quote:
Dr. Ronald L. Mallett, an African American physicist, will talk about his theory of time travel and his successful attempt to build a time machine at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 7, in Elliott University Center Auditorium.
Again for the intelligent-but-focused-on-something-else-people around here, let's do note that we all travel through time at the rate of one second per second. Captain Nemo probably does it at the rate of one tenth of a second per tenth of a second, and I refuse to speculate on how fast four sigma does it.
__________________
If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination. Once begun upon this downward path, you never know where you are to stop. Many a man has dated his ruin from some murder or other that perhaps he thought little of
at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-21-2006, 01:12 PM
4sigma's Avatar
4sigma 4sigma is online now
95% confidence man
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Somewhere near the mean
College: Caltech Alumni
Favorite beer: root
Posts: 14,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by E. Blackadder View Post
Quote:
Dr. Ronald L. Mallett, an African American physicist, will talk about his theory of time travel and his successful attempt to build a time machine at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 7, in Elliott University Center Auditorium.
Again for the intelligent-but-focused-on-something-else-people around here, let's do note that we all travel through time at the rate of one second per second. Captain Nemo probably does it at the rate of one tenth of a second per tenth of a second, and I refuse to speculate on how fast four sigma does it.
__________________
I am 95% confident.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-06-2006, 09:14 PM
John Titor's Avatar
John Titor John Titor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 67
Default

Keep using that one. If you travel far enough in time in might be funny.
Somehow I doubt it.
__________________
Unfortunately, time travel is not an exact science. There is inherent error and chaos in the computers ability to make accurate calculations. Based on the current technology of the clocks and sensors, distortion units are only accurate to about 60 years or so. So no, in 2036, we are unable to travel back 1000 years due to the error rate in the system. The divergence between the worldline of origin and the target worldline would be too great...I don’t think you would like 2036 very much.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.32272 seconds with 7 queries