Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > Exams - General > Actuarial Study Manual & Seminar Specific Forum > Steve Paris Consulting Study Seminars > Paris's Spring 2007 MLC Seminar
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet the Employees of DW Simpson
Patty Jacobsen Simpson, Bob Morand, Kristyn Sakelaris, Sean Loboda, KC Cho, Maureen Matous, Ellen Page
Aaron Benton, Becki Tobia, Kimberly Skora, Margit Vogele, Barclay Burns, Jason Blundy, Dan Karrow, Tom Troceen
Valorie Mulder, Marianne Westphal, Carol Lee, Jennifer Retford, Kieran Welsh-Phillips, Lindsey Nelson, Emily Paxton
Angie Wachholz, Derek Mulder, Julie Garwood, Caitlin Cunningham, David Benton, Dave Retford, Sarah Cleveland, Rhonda Glick
Genevieve Shannon, Meghan Bautista, Carol Datu, Barb Rave, Jesus Perez, Dan Kane, Chris Zdenek, Scott Simon, Kriss Wells


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-06-2007, 09:42 AM
dsmith3 dsmith3 is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Studying for Exam DP - ILA
Favorite beer: Free
Posts: 538
Default Multiple lives question

peewee,

This comes from ASM 36.20. For an insurance on (55:55) that pays a death benefit of 1000 at the moment of the first death, you are given:
(i) Future lifetimes are independent.
(ii) Mortality on both lives follow de Moivre's law with w=100.
(iii) force of interest is .04

Calculate the net single premium for the insurance.

I know this is not a very difficult problem, especially in the single life. But with multiple lives the integral gets very ugly. Is there another way to do this problem other than integrals? Thanks. Have a great Easter weekend.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-09-2007, 12:37 PM
Steve Paris's Avatar
Steve Paris Steve Paris is offline
Note Contributor
SOA
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Crawfordville, FL (just south of Tallahassee)
Posts: 74
Default

Hey D-Rat,

Sorry for not checking this for a few days, but I spent this weekend at the beach.

Here's how I would do this problem (no evaluation of integrals):

The integral that would give this NSP is 1000 * Int(from 0 to 45) [v^t * t_p_xy * mu_xy(t)] dt. Notice that because of independence, t_p_xy = t_p_x * t_p_y, and mu_xy(t) = mu_x(t) + mu_y(t). So when you multiply t_p_xy * mu_xy(t), you'll get the sum of two terms: t_p_x * t_p_y * mu_x(t) + t_p_x * t_p_y * mu_y(t).

Now recognize that under DML, t_p_x * mu_x(t) = 1/(w-x) = 1/45 in this case. Likewise t_p_y * mu_y(t) = 1/45. So the sum of the two terms in the last paragraph is 1/45 * t_p_y + 1/45 * t_p_x = 2/45 * t_p_55 since both x and y are 55.

Factoring out the constant 2/45, we get the NSP = 1000 * 2/45 * Int(from 0 to 45) [v^t * t_p_55] dt. Now recognize the integral as being a(bar)_55 = (1 - A(bar)_55) / delta. Using DML, A(bar)_55 = 1/45 * a_angle45 = 1/45 * (1-e^(-45*.04))/.04 = .463723.

So I get NSP = 1000 * 2/45 * (1 - .463723)/.04 = 596.

P.S. Is this the manual's answer? Please let me know what their answers to the questions are from now on, so that I'll know if I've miscalculated something.
__________________
Steve Paris
www.abacusli.com
paris@math.fsu.edu


Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.20794 seconds with 9 queries