Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 1/P - Probability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys
Pension, Life, Health and Investment Actuarial Jobs
Property and Casualty Actuarial Jobs   Registration Form


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:12 PM
mfarr530 mfarr530 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Studying for MFE
Favorite beer: is in a green bottle
Posts: 129
Default Another integral question

My study guide often skips steps and leaves me stuck. If anyone can fill in the blanks on this integral, I would greatly appreciate it.

a) 324*integral from 0 to infinity[x(x+3)^-5 dx]


c) 81*integral from 0 to infinity[(x+3)^-4 dx]


What step am I missing that removes the x and divides 324 by 4? I think it may be adding 3 and subtracting 3 to get another (x+3), but I can't get there. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:21 PM
tommie frazier tommie frazier is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Favorite beer: The kind with 2 e's
Posts: 19,175
Default

u = x+3
du = dx

x = u-3

first one is integral from a to b (figure those out or switch back at the end) of (u-3)/u^5 du. simplify and integrate. i think.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:21 PM
actas123 actas123 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 25
Default

Read this post its similar and should answer your question:
http://www.actuarialoutpost.com/actu...d.php?t=130542
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:21 PM
tommie frazier tommie frazier is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Favorite beer: The kind with 2 e's
Posts: 19,175
Default

second one is another u sub, super easy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2008, 10:31 PM
mfarr530 mfarr530 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Studying for MFE
Favorite beer: is in a green bottle
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tommie frazier View Post
second one is another u sub, super easy.
Sorry, I guess I didn't explain it extremely well.

a) is the first step in the problem.

c) is the second step in the problem

I was looking for a step b) to show how to get from a) to c). I can get from c) to the answer, which is "1".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:01 PM
atomic's Avatar
atomic atomic is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,088
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfarr530 View Post
Sorry, I guess I didn't explain it extremely well.

a) is the first step in the problem.

c) is the second step in the problem

I was looking for a step b) to show how to get from a) to c). I can get from c) to the answer, which is "1".
The methodology that was used to go from the first integral to the second is integration by parts, with the choice






Therefore,



implies

.

Since

,

we obtain the claimed result.

Obviously, this is not the most straightforward method of solution. It is far easier to employ the linear substitution previously mentioned.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-20-2008, 07:08 AM
mfarr530 mfarr530 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Studying for MFE
Favorite beer: is in a green bottle
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by atomic View Post
The methodology that was used to go from the first integral to the second is integration by parts, with the choice






Therefore,



implies

.

Since

,

we obtain the claimed result.

Obviously, this is not the most straightforward method of solution. It is far easier to employ the linear substitution previously mentioned.
No, makes sense. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.33212 seconds with 9 queries