Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > CAS > CAS Exams > Exam 6 US (old Part 7U)
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2009, 03:50 AM
captn's Avatar
captn captn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 662
Default 2004 #63 - Ceded UNEP counted as total recoverable (sched F)

In calculating total recoverables for schedule F it seems that we include the amount of Ceded Unearned Premium Reserves.

I can't figure out why this makes sense.

You expect to get recoverables due to losses from your reinsurer - but why in zeus' anus would u expect to get your ceded UNEP back?

Wasn't the UNEP given to the reinsurer as compensation for covering a portion of the losses??? So the way i'm reading it right now is like this,

"hey, cover me. Hey, and give me back what i'm paying you to cover me"

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2009, 07:27 AM
sticks1839 sticks1839 is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,159
Default

It's definitely column 13 of Part 3, so it should be included. The only thing that sorta makes sense to me is that if the contract was broken somehow, you would be owed the UEPR back from the reinsurer.

It's more like:

"hey cover me and here's the money. and hey you haven't 'earned' all of this just yet so you still could owe it back."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-10-2009, 08:57 AM
gosuruss's Avatar
gosuruss gosuruss is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Favorite beer: whatever is free
Posts: 4,328
Blog Entries: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captn View Post
In calculating total recoverables for schedule F it seems that we include the amount of Ceded Unearned Premium Reserves.

I can't figure out why this makes sense.

You expect to get recoverables due to losses from your reinsurer - but why in zeus' anus would u expect to get your ceded UNEP back?

Wasn't the UNEP given to the reinsurer as compensation for covering a portion of the losses??? So the way i'm reading it right now is like this,

"hey, cover me. Hey, and give me back what i'm paying you to cover me"

Do note that recoverables only come into Schedule F provision when a reinsurer is classified slow paying.
__________________
No rational argument will have a rational effect on a man who does not want to adopt a rational attitude. -Karl Popper

Last edited by gosuruss; 05-10-2009 at 09:02 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-10-2009, 11:57 AM
cgott42 cgott42 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 905
Default

Side Question -
Part a asks for "Calculate the overdue percentage that would appear on Schedule F-Part 4, Aging of Ceded Reinsurance, in P’s 2003 Annual Statement."
Howevever isn't the ratio of all overdue (i.e. even +1 day overdue) included in the ratio in col 12? So why only +120 o/d?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2009, 12:01 PM
triplea's Avatar
triplea triplea is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Studying for Exam Committee
Posts: 4,922
Blog Entries: 2
Default

I believe either was acceptable, since they both are "overdue" %'s in Sched F.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-2009, 12:15 PM
cgott42 cgott42 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 905
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captn View Post
In calculating total recoverables for schedule F it seems that we include the amount of Ceded Unearned Premium Reserves.

I can't figure out why this makes sense.

You expect to get recoverables due to losses from your reinsurer - but why in zeus' anus would u expect to get your ceded UNEP back?

Wasn't the UNEP given to the reinsurer as compensation for covering a portion of the losses??? So the way i'm reading it right now is like this,

"hey, cover me. Hey, and give me back what i'm paying you to cover me"

remember this provision is to reduce assets (recoverables) held which the company may never realize (remember UPR is a liability - it's money the insurer has to return if they cancel the policy with the insured.) So part of the Cash received is not secured due to the potential of cancellation - i.e. the UPR amount. So if the insurer shuts down (remember liquidation acctg here) they have to (a) pay off the loss reserves and (b) refund the UPR to the insurer. Thus, if the insurer has ceded out their liabilities, both of these are part of the provision penalty in case the reinsurer doesn't pay and the insurer has to pay them out of his pocket.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-23-2011, 05:37 PM
gaddy gaddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by triplea View Post
I believe either was acceptable, since they both are "overdue" %'s in Sched F.


Can someone tell me how they would do this as the total % overdue (col 10 / col 11)? I don't think I know what goes in the "current" column of Part 4 so it makes that answer weird.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.35354 seconds with 9 queries