![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
In calculating total recoverables for schedule F it seems that we include the amount of Ceded Unearned Premium Reserves.
I can't figure out why this makes sense. You expect to get recoverables due to losses from your reinsurer - but why in zeus' anus would u expect to get your ceded UNEP back? Wasn't the UNEP given to the reinsurer as compensation for covering a portion of the losses??? So the way i'm reading it right now is like this, "hey, cover me. Hey, and give me back what i'm paying you to cover me" |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's definitely column 13 of Part 3, so it should be included. The only thing that sorta makes sense to me is that if the contract was broken somehow, you would be owed the UEPR back from the reinsurer.
It's more like: "hey cover me and here's the money. and hey you haven't 'earned' all of this just yet so you still could owe it back." |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
No rational argument will have a rational effect on a man who does not want to adopt a rational attitude. -Karl Popper Last edited by gosuruss; 05-10-2009 at 09:02 AM.. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Side Question -
Part a asks for "Calculate the overdue percentage that would appear on Schedule F-Part 4, Aging of Ceded Reinsurance, in P’s 2003 Annual Statement." Howevever isn't the ratio of all overdue (i.e. even +1 day overdue) included in the ratio in col 12? So why only +120 o/d? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Can someone tell me how they would do this as the total % overdue (col 10 / col 11)? I don't think I know what goes in the "current" column of Part 4 so it makes that answer weird. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|