![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi, I have a pretty basic question about the parallelogram method.
Let's say there's a single rate change of 8% at 7/1, and we want to put the earned calendar year premium on level. Naively, I'd guess that if seven eighths of the premium comes from policies written before 7/1, we'd use an overall rate factor of the weighted average. But that's not what the parallelogram method prescribes! Instead, we use the harmonic weighted average: Why is the harmonic weighted average better than the ordinary weighted average here?
__________________
| ,,__ |o" _ )~ "I guess the definition of a lunatic is a man surrounded by them." ~Pound | `` `` Last edited by cab691; 02-26-2012 at 11:10 PM.. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
What are you computing with the parallelogram method?
Spoiler:
__________________
"What do you mean I don't have the prerequisites for this class? I've failed it twice before!" |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
To add to Coly's post:
Suppose that there's a subsequent +5% rate change in the following year at, say, 4/1. What factor is needed to bring the year in question's earned premium to on-level?
__________________
The Search is about to begin . . . There is still time left to join. I find your lack of faith disturbing. Wait until you have kids. ![]() Freedom of speech is not a license to discourtesy
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|