![]() |
|
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
edit: I guess what I meant was... it's not like "oh, he almost got the pass mark but answered the most difficult questions correctly, so that should be considered"
__________________
Spoiler: |
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Pass Mark" (as a raw point value) <==> "MQC Threshhold"
And I do not believe that there is a review of individual student's exams in their entirety.
__________________
The Search is about to begin . . . There is still time left to join. I find your lack of faith disturbing. Wait until you have kids. ![]() Freedom of speech is not a license to discourtesy
|
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe if a grader feels sorry for you because you used a more time consuming method than technique #1 where you develop ultimate claim counts and ultimate average severities?
__________________
Exams: 6, 7, 8, 9 |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
I used the additive approach as well. Don't remember my answer, though. On the bright side, the exam will be posted soon. So if you remember your answer, you can always re-work the problem and see if you were right.
|
|
#56
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looking at the exam, on 21a, I misread the given case o/s as "reported" and accidentally calculated IBNR as
expected ult-case o/s instead of expected ult-(paid + case o/s). Part b obviously should have tipped me off, but is there any chance I get some partial credit?
__________________
"Okay, settle down, prostitutes." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|