Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA > Modules 1-5
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

US PROPERTY AND CASUALTY JOBS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2011, 09:35 AM
wangwwzj wangwwzj is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beijing,China
Posts: 72
Exclamation EOM4 task2

hey, guys, in task 2, we're asked to answer what do we see as the key risks in this product that need to be better managed.

in my analysis,

i find that adjustment factor of mortality has a big affect on the profit.
if i change the factor from 70% to 80% ,I even get a negtive profit.

i also test the risk of interest rate and lapse rate, commission bonus.

in my opinion, adjustment factor is the key risk. anybody have suggestion on my conclusion?

thanks!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-17-2011, 06:30 AM
wangwwzj wangwwzj is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beijing,China
Posts: 72
Default

ummmmm, no body answered me, i have to do it in my way.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-17-2011, 08:39 AM
BK1984 BK1984 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 109
Default

My suggestion is that you're approaching the problem the wrong way. In task 1, you already have analyzed emerging product experience and how it aligns with original assumptions.

Look at the mortality experience between separate bands with different underwriting requirements. Would it make sense for mortality to jump that much given the experience?

Task 2 is not a question of modeling or sensitivity analysis. You've compiled the data in task 1 that you need in order to make some initial business decisions. Task 2 is asking you to analyze that data. I'm not going to give the answer, but emerging experience is deviating quite a bit from one of the key model assumptions, and mortality is not it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2011, 09:23 PM
wangwwzj wangwwzj is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Beijing,China
Posts: 72
Default

well, thank you for your answer, i think i was on the wrong way. i've got the idea now. thx!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2012, 06:53 PM
jy006m's Avatar
jy006m jy006m is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Studying for FAP
Posts: 924
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BK1984 View Post
I'm not going to give the answer, but emerging experience is deviating quite a bit from one of the key model assumptions, and mortality is not it.
It's lapse rate, right? Mortality and investment look fine if I filled out those 2 tabs correctly.
__________________
P FM MFE MLC C

VEE Econ VEE Fin VEE Stats

IA FA
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
eom4

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.40730 seconds with 9 queries