![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
Salary Surveys |
Health |
D.W. Simpson |
Casualty Jobs |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you have a numerical answer? I got 26/56 but I don't know if it is correct.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have a couple of arguments that give 36/56.
Serious suggestion for small combinatorics problems: list out all the possibilities and count. There are 8 choose 3 = 56 ways to seat the people, so listing them and counting should take you under 3 minutes. More importantly, listing them will help you see patterns that will let you understand where the combinatorial formulas come from. Not listing cases in a combinatorics problem that you can't do is like not drawing a picture in a geometry problem that you can't do. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Four solutions:
1. List out the possibilities. Number the chairs 1 through 8 from left to right. Then to have at least 2 men beside each other, we need the men to sit in one of the following arrangements of seats: Spoiler: 2. Keep in mind the list from the previous solution. How can we count them efficiently? Of the men who sit together, one of them is on the left. Spoiler: 3. Counting differently: How many ways can all 3 sit together? How many ways can exactly 2 sit together? Spoiler: 4. We can count the complement: How many ways can the men sit all apart? Spoiler: |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks Davvvve for your input and suggestions.
I meet with this kind of problem from ASM test occasionally, not very confident about it. It cost me much more time than other questions because I can't find a general solution to deal with it. Now I have your solutions. to Academic Actuary, I created this question by my own, as you were, not so confident with my own answer and solution, so I put it down here. Thanks again for doctor Daaave. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|