Actuarial Outpost > CAS Exam 8 - Fall 2012
 Register Blogs Wiki FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
 FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

#101
07-12-2012, 08:59 AM
 gaddy Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 2,274

Quote:
 Originally Posted by sticks1839 but that's the risk when you only cover 20-30% of the syllabus...still think it's adequate?
I intended for my tone to imply a certain color font. Maybe it came off too seriously?
#102
07-12-2012, 09:20 AM
 sticks1839 Member CAS AAA Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,159

Quote:
 Originally Posted by gaddy I intended for my tone to imply a certain color font. Maybe it came off too seriously?
In that case, my bad. Tough to tell tone on this board sometimes because there might be people who actually hold that viewpoint.
#103
07-12-2012, 09:39 AM
 jenn3539 Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Boston Posts: 413

I'm in - first time taker. I was on the fence on whether I wanted to keep going or take an exam hiatus to focus on family, fresh off my third exam 9 fail, but I'm hoping that some new material that I'm more familiar with will restore some of my confidence.

I have the TIA seminar for 8 that served me well for 5, 6, and 7. The only exam I have not used TIA for was Exam 9 and I'm starting to realize that was a huge mistake.
#104
07-17-2012, 09:13 AM
 FourKicks Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 4,110

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mosaic Am I the only person who counts this as a good sign?
as someone who struggles to answer all the questions on upper levels, i think it's a great sign.
#105
07-18-2012, 02:15 AM
 i++ Michael Woods CAS Join Date: May 2012 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 128

I continue to sludge through papers. I just spent nine hours on the Lee paper alone! I tried reading the paper first, then got disinterested once he started proving out things the long way (i.e. by using the density instead of using the survival function). Then I tried the TIA videos... that helped a bit but was still confused. Mahler's manual finally gave me clarity on all of the math behind everything (he always goes into more detail than you need... which is something I enjoy when I'm struggling with something).

It took me a while to get used to the concept of Table L and M. I've never seen these before. TIA recommends reading Lee first, but I had to skip ahead to Brosius to get a better concept of what a Table M is. Mahler's manual goes through the Lee paper's math first... then an NCCI paper on retro rating, Brosius Table M, and Skurnick Table L before getting to the Lee paper's application to retro rating. Mahler's order makes a bit more sense to someone who has never worked with Table L/M before.
#106
07-18-2012, 02:38 AM
 shug0972 Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 128

Just started with AAA Risk Classification today. Hope I am not too late.

Got TIA and may get a second manual... maybe Fox or Mahler
#107
07-19-2012, 01:20 AM
 i++ Michael Woods CAS Join Date: May 2012 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 128

This exam has a lot of old papers on it. This is advanced ratemaking... so you'd think that the techniques would be more cutting edge. Nope.

$Z=\dfrac{E}{E+K_E}$
#108
07-21-2012, 05:34 PM
 i++ Michael Woods CAS Join Date: May 2012 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 128

I feel like there's a lot of interdependencies among the articles, e.g. you must read papers A and B before you can understand paper C.... but you also need to understand paper C to understand part of paper A.

Reminds me of exam 6U where it was difficult to get the big picture on your first pass through because of the many interrelated topics.

Or at least, I hope this is the case. Not all of the papers are clicking for me yet. I'm needing to just move on after spending enough time on a paper... and hoping it clicks on the second pass through.
#109
07-22-2012, 11:50 AM
 TwoStep Member CAS SOA Join Date: Oct 2008 Studying for All done! Posts: 794

Quote:
 Originally Posted by i++ I feel like there's a lot of interdependencies among the articles, e.g. you must read papers A and B before you can understand paper C.... but you also need to understand paper C to understand part of paper A. Reminds me of exam 6U where it was difficult to get the big picture on your first pass through because of the many interrelated topics. Or at least, I hope this is the case. Not all of the papers are clicking for me yet. I'm needing to just move on after spending enough time on a paper... and hoping it clicks on the second pass through.
I kind of agree, but I think its not as bad as 6U, and there is a little more redundancy versus inter-dependency (which means a lot because 6U had a ton of redundancy). You could maybe pick one of the papers on Table M to get what you need for the exam, and then have a two page appendix to explain Table L.

I also find it odd that GLMs are more prominent on Exam 7 than on Exam 8.
#110
07-22-2012, 10:12 PM
 FourKicks Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 4,110

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM.

 -- Default Style - Fluid Width ---- Default Style - Fixed Width ---- Old Default Style ---- Easy on the eyes ---- Smooth Darkness ---- Chestnut ---- Apple-ish Style ---- If Apples were blue ---- If Apples were green ---- If Apples were purple ---- Halloween 2007 ---- B&W ---- Halloween ---- AO Christmas Theme ---- Turkey Day Theme ---- AO 2007 beta ---- 4th Of July Contact Us - Actuarial Outpost - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top