Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > General
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-28-2012, 02:24 PM
Hero3128's Avatar
Hero3128 Hero3128 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Favorite beer: European
Posts: 6,088
Default

As much as I love Real Analysis, you'll never use it for anything actuarial.
__________________
P FM 3L MFE 4/C
VEE APPLIED STATISTICAL METHODS
VEE ECONOMICS
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-28-2012, 04:57 PM
Actuarialsuck Actuarialsuck is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Celtics4Life View Post
real analysis isn't hard. all you have to do is assume the thing they're telling you to prove is false and then use definitions to get a contradiction out of it. once you realize that it becomes easy. but overall i'll say it helps you think through stuff a lot better.
The first ugrad course in Real Analysis can be challenging for anyone who has never dealt with proofs. Further classes in Real Analysis are hard for a LOT of people.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buru Buru View Post
i'm not. i do not troll.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-28-2012, 05:48 PM
oedipus rex's Avatar
oedipus rex oedipus rex is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Favorite beer: Founders Dirty ******* Scotch Ale
Posts: 11,064
Default

if you're interested at all in measure-theoretic probability you need it, otherwise it will not help you in actuarial work specifically, at least not any actuarial work i have come across.
__________________
Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards. --S.K.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-28-2012, 06:03 PM
Celtics4Life's Avatar
Celtics4Life Celtics4Life is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Studying for EOM1
Favorite beer: Straight Edge
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Actuarialsuck View Post
The first ugrad course in Real Analysis can be challenging for anyone who has never dealt with proofs. Further classes in Real Analysis are hard for a LOT of people.
agree. i didn't mean to say it's easy - just wanted to point out it's not as crazy as people make it out to be. people are intimidated by notation.
__________________
P FM MFE MLC C ECON FIN STAT IA FA APC
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-28-2012, 06:54 PM
George Frankly's Avatar
George Frankly George Frankly is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CO
Favorite beer: Sam Smith Oatmeal
Posts: 1,588
Default

I'll agree that the material isn't directly applicable, but the tools are useful to have. So I say it's worthwhile and would recommend it.

FTR, I took three semesters (two real, one complex).
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-29-2012, 03:18 PM
SliceApproximateIntegrate's Avatar
SliceApproximateIntegrate SliceApproximateIntegrate is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Party in the USA
Studying for ehm ehl sea - tomorrow
College: Fighting Squirrels
Favorite beer: Highland Gaelic
Posts: 892
Default

If you have a choice to take point set topology instead, take that. I found the proofs to be more fun. On the other hand, if you get to the IFTs in Real Analysis, that did help with understanding multivariate transformations.
__________________
P FM MFE C MLC
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-29-2012, 03:44 PM
dukelampard dukelampard is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Studying for CAS 5
Posts: 3,855
Default

Any theoretical math class you take will make you a better person.

If I didn't need money, or if I were smart enough, I'd be doing a Math phd right now.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditkaworshipper View Post
If no one has babies nowadays, how are there going to be hot 20 somethings when we're in our 40's and 50's?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-29-2012, 08:32 PM
allenp27 allenp27 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 70
Default

It will not help you on any particular questions, but IMO yes it will absolutely help you pass exams.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-13-2012, 09:40 AM
TheGillotine's Avatar
TheGillotine TheGillotine is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: The Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 4,354
Default

Real analysis is a good one, but I'd recommend anyone going into the actuarial or other mathematical/statistical field to take at least a few higher level math classes. Anything that teaches you to make rigorous mathematical arguments is good.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-06-2012, 03:31 PM
Malyerac Malyerac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
College: Binghamton
Posts: 108
Default

Hello everyone, thank you all for your replies, as much as I do want to develop myself mathematically, I've decided to fufill VEE requirements and study for another exam.

I already find my course load quite difficult, it seems math is the only subject that you can spend hours on and make almost virtually no progress. I'm taking a prep course for MLC next semester and hope to have 3+ exams before I graduate.

Thanks!
__________________
P FM MLC MFE C
Validation: Economics Finance Statistics
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.38048 seconds with 9 queries