![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| FlashChat | Actuarial Discussion | Preliminary Exams | CAS/SOA Exams | Cyberchat | Around the World | Suggestions |
Registration Form |
D.W. Simpson |
Australia Jobs | Pension |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am having a hard time with the bayesian problems, looking at the solution I do not understand what it is doing. Does anyone have any better way of explaining the bayesian process?
__________________
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
can you be specific on which part of the solution is confusing? is it the first step of how they arrived at q^5(1-q)^2 as the expression to integrate?
__________________
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
yes, the first line I am not understanding
__________________
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
the main thing about bayesian is finding a posterior distribution for q given the data you have observed:
pr(q|data) = [ pr(data|q)*pr(q) ] / pr(data) This similar to the conditional probability formula. pr(data|q) is just probability of seeing 1 claim twice which is going to be 2q(1-q) * 2q(1-q) pr(q) is given as 4q^3 pr(data) can be ignored and just called a constant C since it is going to evaluate to some number. from this step you can tell that the distribution is some constant C*q^5(1-q)^2. next compare this to your table of distributions and figure out what C is supposed to be.
__________________
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok, so is the reason the ceofficients are taken away due to them getting cancelled out in the posterior formula?
__________________
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
the constants didnt get cancelled out - you figure out the constant in two ways
1) integrate the expression Cq^5(1-q)^2 from 0 to 1 and set it equal to 1 and then solve for C 2) recognize that this is a known distribution and deduce C from the formula for the pdf of that known distribution.
__________________
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok I see, thank you for th help.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|