Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet Claude Penland, ACAS and DW Simpson Partner

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2007, 05:46 PM
llcooljabe's Avatar
llcooljabe llcooljabe is online now
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Favorite beer: Rickard's Red
Posts: 7,774
Default Gov't gives infants blood transfusions over objections of religious parents

Discuss.



Quote:
VANCOUVER, British Columbia (Reuters) - Canada's first birth of sextuplets has become a battle of church versus state over medical care for the surviving children.

The British Columbia government forced blood transfusions for two of the four surviving premature babies last week despite the objections of the babies' parents, who are members of the Jehovah's Witness faith and believe the Bible prohibits transfusions.

Gordon Campbell, premier of the province of British Columbia, defended the intervention, saying that while Canada protects religious freedom it also has an obligation to protect children's lives.

"We act, I think, with the children's best interest in mind, and we will continue to do that," Campbell told reporters on Thursday, a day after news of the government's intervention became public.

The sextuplets, four boys and two girls, were born in Vancouver in early January. The babies were delivered prematurely after only 25 weeks gestation, and two of the infants have since died.

Medical officials say premature babies often need blood transfusions as part of their early care, and British Columbia officials intervened to seize custody of three of the children last week after the two deaths.

A court has blocked publication of the family's name.

The parents, who have regained custody of the children, have asked the court to block future transfusions. They have also charged that the province's intervention violates their constitutional rights.

The children's father complained in a court document that because the parents wanted to use medical alternatives to blood transfusions "we have been stripped of our parental rights and have been labeled unfit."

The family's lawyer, who has represented Jehovah's Witnesses in other medical cases, alleges the province of British Columbia violated a 1995 Canadian Supreme Court decision that requires parents be given a fair hearing before intervention.

A court hearing on the family's complaint is scheduled for February 22.
The Canadian Medical Association does not have a policy dealing with blood transfusions for infants who object to the practice, said Jeff Blackmer, executive director of the group's ethics office.

But Blackmer said a doctor's first responsibility is to the patient. In the case of newborns who cannot make their own decision, the doctor may ask for intervention if it appears the parents are not acting in the child's best interest.

"This action is not taken lightly, but is often a last resort when the physician feels the patient is at risk of imminent harm," Blackmer wrote in an e-mail.
__________________
www.GoodNewsNow.info
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-02-2007, 05:56 PM
Double High C's Avatar
Double High C Double High C is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: atop the 5th line above the staff
Posts: 10,014
Default

Canader is right.

(Same thing would be done in the US.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-2007, 06:06 PM
Jack's Avatar
Jack Jack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 100 Luten Avenue, 10312
Studying for Life
Favorite beer: Free Beer
Posts: 11,187
Default

Of course they did the right thing. The kids shouldn't die just because their parents are nuts.
__________________
天安門大屠殺。 六四大屠殺 北京大屠殺 法轮功
台湾独立运动 西藏 自由西藏 胡锦涛是邪恶。
Must be because I had the flu for Christmas
And I'm not feeling up to par
It increases my paranoia
Like looking at my mirror and seeing a police car.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-02-2007, 06:10 PM
Dr. John Zoidberg's Avatar
Dr. John Zoidberg Dr. John Zoidberg is online now
Surprisingly Not a Troll, MD
CAS
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: F*** City
Studying for donating sperm to orphans
College: Postgraduate Doily Magnate
Favorite beer: Anything Tom tells me isn't total crap
Posts: 7,666
Blog Entries: 3
Default

A similar question would be "Should we let parents starve their kids if its a religious obligation?" Of course, the answer is that the parents should be charged w/ child endangerment.
__________________
The Angel of Sects.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-02-2007, 06:16 PM
Mulan Mulan is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
CAS CCA AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 9,258
Default

The further out on the "distance from reality" meter that a medically related religious belief is the more the state should be able to override it. The non-belief in blood transfusions MIGHT have made sense when people believed it carried ones soul/force/whatever, but the sheer number of transfusions and science have shown that there is nothing mythical about blood.

So sure, override the parents to save the kids in life/death/serious situations.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-02-2007, 06:28 PM
Abnormal Abnormal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,393
Default

Don't forget that 2 of the babies have already died.

Quote:
The family's lawyer...alleges the province of British Columbia violated a 1995 Canadian Supreme Court decision that requires parents be given a fair hearing before intervention.
Exactly. Let's wait while another couple of kids die for the court to make up their mind.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2007, 06:30 PM
Griffin 1's Avatar
Griffin 1 Griffin 1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: This is the worst kind of discrimination. The kind against me.
Favorite beer: Grizzly. No, wait - polar bears.
Posts: 10,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mulan View Post
The further out on the "distance from reality" meter that a medically related religious belief is the more the state should be able to override it. The non-belief in blood transfusions MIGHT have made sense when people believed it carried ones soul/force/whatever, but the sheer number of transfusions and science have shown that there is nothing mythical about blood.
Whether or not one agrees with the parents or agrees with the state, the argument outlined above is ridiculous.
__________________
I've never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-02-2007, 06:38 PM
SamTheEagle's Avatar
SamTheEagle SamTheEagle is online now
Member
CAS SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beak deep in road kill.
Favorite beer: Whatever Pseudolus tells me isn't total crap.
Posts: 35,522
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Griffin 1 View Post
Whether or not one agrees with the parents or agrees with the state, the argument outlined above is ridiculous.
I expect nothing less.
__________________
Disclaimer: Past results do not indicate future performance.

Passion and prejudice govern the world; only under the name of reason. - John Wesley

Fallen man is not simply an imperfect creature who needs improvement: he is a rebel who must lay down his arms. - C.S. Lewis

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2pac Shakur View Post
(feel free to use as a sig)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-02-2007, 07:15 PM
whisper's Avatar
whisper whisper is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Favorite beer: Hefewizen
Posts: 15,119
Default

I agree with the doctors actions. Their primary duty is to the patient and if they feel that the guardian is not acting in the child's best interest they should take action to over-ride the guardian. I sympathize with the parents. They have strong beliefs in this regard, and believe that they are doing the right thing. Even though they plan on raising the children in their faith, its impossible to say if the kids will adopt it or reject it when of age.

I wonder if the government acted correctly in seizing the children. There is a process to follow, and if that process wasn't followed - the parents rights were violated. If the proper process was followed, the parents are out of luck.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-02-2007, 07:34 PM
Double High C's Avatar
Double High C Double High C is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: atop the 5th line above the staff
Posts: 10,014
Default

Sometimes, process should not - and must not - be followed.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.45152 seconds with 6 queries