Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Meet the Employees of D.W. Simpson & Co.
Lindsey Nelson, Becki Tobia, Angie Wachholz, Diane Vanik, Katherine Hays
Alex Babic, Paul Castro, Steve Davis, Lesley Traverso, Tom Troceen, James Lecoutre
Aaron Benton, K.C. Cho, Patty Jacobsen, Dave Simpson, Bob Morand, Dave Retford, Carol Datu
Maureen Matous, R. Hicks, Marianne Westphal, Kim Skora, Kristyn Sakelaris, Ellen Hoppenjan
James Gardner, Lorraine Cully, Sarah Cleveland, Bethany Rave, Amy Trapp, David Benton, Jennifer Retford
Dan Karrow, Ginger Hassler, Rhonda Glick, Bryan Duffy, Derek Mulder, Barclay Burns, Barb Rave
Chris Hicks, Valorie Etheridge, Tom Munar, Julie Garwood, Margit Vogele


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-03-2007, 02:20 PM
Ronald Reagan Ronald Reagan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: "We will get only what we know how to take"
Posts: 8,705
Default Give me permanent bases, I'll give you a drawdown

Quote:
WSJ: Gates Trades the Surge for Permanent Iraq Bases
By Spencer Ackerman | bio
Guantanamo isn't the only issue on which Defense Secretary Bob Gates is seeking a middle path. Gates made headlines during a trip to Hawaii a month ago when he called a decades-long U.S. troop presence in Iraq "a great idea." Now, reports the Wall Street Journal, Gates figures the path to Congressional assent for an enduring, South Korea-style stay in Iraq is to come up with near-term troop reductions. It's basically a trade-off: cut the surge short in order to stay in Iraq indefinitely.

Gates's fear is that President Bush intends to extend the surge until the end of his term. But the longer the surge lasts, the greater the likelihood that political support for the entire Iraq war will collapse, as evidenced by last week's high-profile defections of GOP Senators Dick Lugar and George Voinovich. Coupled with rising sentiment that the Democrats aren't doing enough to end the war -- the basis for next week's crush of antiwar amendments to the defense bill -- and Gates sees the war drawing to a too-rapid conclusion, leaving behind a terrorism-exporting failed state. His answer? Cut off the surge, probably by next spring, and convince Congress to accept a reduced-but-enduring mission in Iraq.

What Gates intends for U.S. forces to do in Iraq over the course of several decades is hardly clear. But how he figures an increasingly anti-war Congress would accept a permanent commitment to Iraq of tens of thousands of troops is a mystery. A senior Army official told the Journal that by the spring, six Army brigades will probably need to depart Iraq due to "manpower and materiel strains," which means overdeployment will bring the surge to a close without any assistance from Congress. (Due to the troop rotation schedule, it will be very difficult to send replacement units to relieve those forces.) The Defense Secretary may simply be holding a losing hand here, offering a near-inevitability in order to secure support for an unpopular idea.
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/election...ent_iraq_bases

Better have some troops there to help with the oil production, I mean democracy promotion.
__________________
"While many regions of the world offer great oil opportunities, the Middle East with two thirds of the world’s oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies, even though companies are anxious for greater access there, progress continues to be slow."- Dick Cheney, 1999

"Even more significant than the numbers is the perception of risk among workers..."- Harvard law professor Paul Weiler
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.60121 seconds with 6 queries