Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Political Issues
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

D.W. Simpson and Company -- Actuary Salary Surveys
Pension, Life, Health and Investment Actuarial Jobs

Property and Casualty Actuarial Jobs   Registration Form


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2007, 03:20 PM
Ronald Reagan Ronald Reagan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: "We will get only what we know how to take"
Posts: 8,705
Default Give me permanent bases, I'll give you a drawdown

Quote:
WSJ: Gates Trades the Surge for Permanent Iraq Bases
By Spencer Ackerman | bio
Guantanamo isn't the only issue on which Defense Secretary Bob Gates is seeking a middle path. Gates made headlines during a trip to Hawaii a month ago when he called a decades-long U.S. troop presence in Iraq "a great idea." Now, reports the Wall Street Journal, Gates figures the path to Congressional assent for an enduring, South Korea-style stay in Iraq is to come up with near-term troop reductions. It's basically a trade-off: cut the surge short in order to stay in Iraq indefinitely.

Gates's fear is that President Bush intends to extend the surge until the end of his term. But the longer the surge lasts, the greater the likelihood that political support for the entire Iraq war will collapse, as evidenced by last week's high-profile defections of GOP Senators Dick Lugar and George Voinovich. Coupled with rising sentiment that the Democrats aren't doing enough to end the war -- the basis for next week's crush of antiwar amendments to the defense bill -- and Gates sees the war drawing to a too-rapid conclusion, leaving behind a terrorism-exporting failed state. His answer? Cut off the surge, probably by next spring, and convince Congress to accept a reduced-but-enduring mission in Iraq.

What Gates intends for U.S. forces to do in Iraq over the course of several decades is hardly clear. But how he figures an increasingly anti-war Congress would accept a permanent commitment to Iraq of tens of thousands of troops is a mystery. A senior Army official told the Journal that by the spring, six Army brigades will probably need to depart Iraq due to "manpower and materiel strains," which means overdeployment will bring the surge to a close without any assistance from Congress. (Due to the troop rotation schedule, it will be very difficult to send replacement units to relieve those forces.) The Defense Secretary may simply be holding a losing hand here, offering a near-inevitability in order to secure support for an unpopular idea.
http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/election...ent_iraq_bases

Better have some troops there to help with the oil production, I mean democracy promotion.
__________________
"While many regions of the world offer great oil opportunities, the Middle East with two thirds of the world’s oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies, even though companies are anxious for greater access there, progress continues to be slow."- Dick Cheney, 1999

"Even more significant than the numbers is the perception of risk among workers..."- Harvard law professor Paul Weiler
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2007, 03:26 PM
Ronald Reagan Ronald Reagan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: "We will get only what we know how to take"
Posts: 8,705
Default

For a funny look back, see topic here:

http://www.actuarialoutpost.com/actu...ermanent+bases

Looks like half the righties that predicted no 'enduring' bases have already taken to new names!

Fool me once...
__________________
"While many regions of the world offer great oil opportunities, the Middle East with two thirds of the world’s oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies, even though companies are anxious for greater access there, progress continues to be slow."- Dick Cheney, 1999

"Even more significant than the numbers is the perception of risk among workers..."- Harvard law professor Paul Weiler
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2007, 03:53 PM
Ronald Reagan Ronald Reagan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: "We will get only what we know how to take"
Posts: 8,705
Default

So, no one's upset that the Sec Def is holding our troops hostage to win a concession for eternal war/occupation?
__________________
"While many regions of the world offer great oil opportunities, the Middle East with two thirds of the world’s oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies, even though companies are anxious for greater access there, progress continues to be slow."- Dick Cheney, 1999

"Even more significant than the numbers is the perception of risk among workers..."- Harvard law professor Paul Weiler
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2007, 03:55 PM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 28,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Reagan View Post
So, no one's upset that the Sec Def is holding our troops hostage to win a concession for eternal war/occupation?
No one's surprised might be a better way of putting it.
__________________
Feif: "one Palestinian is worth about 51 cents"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2007, 03:56 PM
SirVLCIV's Avatar
SirVLCIV SirVLCIV is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Reagan View Post
So, no one's upset that the Sec Def is holding our troops hostage to win a concession for eternal war/occupation?
You need a hobby.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2007, 04:13 PM
The Diabolical Biz Markie's Avatar
The Diabolical Biz Markie The Diabolical Biz Markie is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Reagan View Post
For a funny look back, see topic here:

http://www.actuarialoutpost.com/actu...ermanent+bases

Looks like half the righties that predicted no 'enduring' bases have already taken to new names!

Fool me once...

Out of curiosity, what "half" would that be? I didn't see too many "righties" on that thread, except Foamy.
__________________
“It’s not based on any particular data point,” a Treasury spokeswoman told Forbes.com Tuesday. “We just wanted to choose a really large number.”

"When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed. He said, 'Look, here's what happened.'"--Joe Biden
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2007, 04:22 PM
MikeTheTiger MikeTheTiger is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Reagan View Post
So, no one's upset that the Sec Def is holding our troops hostage to win a concession for eternal war/occupation?
Putting a permanent base in the Kurdish north while simultaneously drawing down our presence in Saudi Arabia and Turkey (both causes of tension in the region) doesn't seem like a bad option to me. Like it or not, we need a military presence in the region one way or another.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-03-2007, 07:12 PM
Harry Harry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 28,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeTheTiger View Post
Like it or not, we need a military presence in the region one way or another.
Why? Does China/Russia/England/India/anyone else need such a presence?
__________________
Feif: "one Palestinian is worth about 51 cents"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2007, 09:04 PM
Sniffer's Avatar
Sniffer Sniffer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Studying for higher consciousness
Favorite beer: LAGER!
Posts: 152
Default

No because we protect most of their asses
__________________
Be careful when you fight the monsters, lest you become one.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-04-2007, 11:02 AM
MikeTheTiger MikeTheTiger is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry View Post
Why? Does China/Russia/England/India/anyone else need such a presence?
You're right, Harry. We can just ignore the fact that we are currently dependent on foreign oil. As much as you might want to cry over spilt milk in that regard, you can't change that reality. Should we do more as a country to reduce reduce that dependence? Absolutely. Should we bury our head in the sand and ignore our dependence in the meantime? Sure, if you want to imperil our economic well-being.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.26485 seconds with 6 queries