The National Enquirer has settled with the Elizabeth Smart family about their July 2, 2002 story. The story was based on discussions with a couple Salt Lake Tribune reporters. Sunday their editor published this letter:
http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Apr/04272003/utah/51772.asp
Quote:
|
Last week, Vigh and Cantera told us about the session and offered their resignations. I verbally wrung their necks and formally disciplined them for ignoring stated policy, but the act did not quite constitute a firing offense. Strictly speaking, talking to the National Enquirer or others of like ilk, in and of itself, is neither illegal nor unethical. Rather, it is akin to drinking water out of a toilet bowl -- dumb, distasteful and, when observed, embarrassing.
|
How would you like to have your boss not fire you but then publicly tell people your actions were like drinking from the toilet bowl?
A related article from the competing Deseret News:
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,124...33431,00.html?