Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Health - Disability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

CATASTROPHE MODELING JOBS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2009, 09:47 PM
merrycherub merrycherub is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 105
Default When designing a group insurance product..

Coinsurance, deductible or limitation is helpful to achieve profit target, that's the reason we use coinsurance?

or there are other reasons...

I am a fish in the field Thanks a lot.....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-24-2009, 11:25 PM
FormLetter's Avatar
FormLetter FormLetter is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,719
Default

Coinsurance helps align the incentives of the insured with those of the insurer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-25-2009, 04:54 PM
DudeMan's Avatar
DudeMan DudeMan is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast
Studying for shts&ggles
Favorite beer: Ginger Beer
Posts: 8,826
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrycherub View Post


but there is a strange thing, that is, when I do the profit test: If I increase the value of deductible and limitations, the profit as % of premium actually increases...

Is it abnormal?
this is normal.

Given that premium levels stay the same
, increasing the deductible increases profit for 2 reasons. (1) It shifts liability from the insurer to the insured. (2) Since the insured has more Out-Of-Pocket (OOP) expense, claim utilization will most likely decrease. I believe this is what FormsLetter is referring to.

Increasing the deductible will certainly increase profit as a % of premium, but my question to you is....what effect does it have on the nominal level of premium? Groups will typically opt to increase their cost-sharing in exchange for lower rate increases....which means lower than expected premiums.

Take this example: Your company collected $1 million in premium this past year. The actuary determines they will need $1.1 million in premium next year in order to meet goals. They file for a 10% rate increase in order to meet their target. In turn, some groups will cancel and some other groups will increase cost-sharing. Let's say 10% of groups (on premium basis) get a better rate with another insurer and cancel, and another 25% increase cost-sharing in exchange for only 5% increase. Coincidentally, the 10% rate increase actually yields a total premium decrease of 2.25% ($100k * 0 + $250k * 1.05 + $650k * 1.1 = $977,500).

Last edited by DudeMan; 07-25-2009 at 05:11 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.29379 seconds with 6 queries