![]() |
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Where are the last 5 questions? How realistic is THAT!?!
__________________
"For now we see in a mirror, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know fully even as also I was fully known." |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like all those questions except for maybe number 5. Although it doesn't require too much probability, all FM related discussions to bonds I've seen is that there is zero percent default risk (ie: you get everything, for sure)...the fact that they used a binomial tree to solve the problem doesn't help make it FM worthy either.
nice problem set though!
__________________
"For now we see in a mirror, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know fully even as also I was fully known." |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'll use this one in place of ASM #4
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
In case you're one of those who refuses to look at the solutions:
DBDBBCACBAACDBCDDCBA
__________________
"For now we see in a mirror, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know fully even as also I was fully known." |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I see nothing on spot or forward rates (i.e., term structure of interest rates), or cashflow duration or immunization. There's too much emphasis on annuities valuation, not enough about bonds, and the question style is dissimilar to what I encountered on the exam. But that's just my impression at a glance.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
2010 - "Year of the Bookworm" "As long as you learn more than you forget, you'll be OK.", F-9 |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's your answer:
Spoiler:
__________________
"For now we see in a mirror, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know fully even as also I was fully known." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|