Actuarial Outpost ASM 12 Ed: Q65.7
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register Blogs Wiki FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
 FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

 Upload your resume securely at https://www.dwsimpson.com to be contacted when our jobs meet your skills and objectives.

 Long-Term Actuarial Math Old Exam MLC Forum

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
#1
03-13-2014, 05:41 PM
 hothead73 Member SOA Join Date: Sep 2012 Studying for ever Favorite beer: the one I don't remember drinking Posts: 140
ASM 12 Ed: Q65.7

Hi all,

I have a couple of questions concerning a Universal Life Policy problem. Here's what it asks in the manual:

Quote:
 For a universal life policy on (40) with death benefit of \$100,000 plus the account value: (i) Expense charges of 6% of premium plus 100. (ii) Cost of insurance is based on 120% of mortality using mu(x)=0.005*1.01^x, with benefits paid at the middle of the year. (iii) Interest credited is 4.5% every year. (iv) The policyholder paid premiums of 100 at time 8 and 500 at time 9. (v) The account value at time 10 is 12,000. Determine the account value at time 8.
I understand how to tackle this problem, but I have an issue in reading assumption (ii). First, when they say "120% of mortality," the solution used 120% of qx, not 120% of mu. I had originally thought it was the other way around.

Secondly, because benefits are paid middle of year, shouldn't the tqx probabilities be 1-year qx's from the mid-year? (For instance, q8.5 and q9.5) The solution just uses q8 and q9, but this seems silly to me. How can we pay out an insurance benefit at t=9.5 for a death that hasn't happened yet, but will occur within the next half a year? I thought it made more sense to pay out at t=9.5 for all deaths occurring from t=(8.5,9.5].

I guess what I'm asking isn't really mathematical or anything like that, but is this the way they'll be phrasing questions on MLC? I'd like to make sure I know how to read these types of things before the exam this April.

Thanks in advance!
__________________
----------
#2
03-13-2014, 11:12 PM
 Abraham Weishaus Member SOA AAA Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 7,250

Your first issue has some merit. I will try to improve the wording.
Your second issue, though, has little merit. We assume account values are updated annually unless told otherwise. Thus COI would be updated at birthdays. It would be unusual to use a COI for two different ages (e.g. 7.5 and 8.5 to update from year 8 to year 9) for the same year. The COI for the ninth year is based on the probability of death in the 9th year. Of course the payment isn't really made midyear, but this assumption is a convenient approximation for payment at the moment of death.
#3
03-14-2014, 11:10 AM
 Phileas Fogg Member SOA Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,458

"benefits paid at the middle of the year" does lend itself to the amusing interpretation above, but yeah, in the context of the problem I don't see it as inferior to

"benefits paid immediately, but assumed to all be paid at the middle of the year as a useful approximation and simplifying assumption"

which seems to be a little unwieldy.
__________________
Jerry Landers: How can you permit all the suffering that goes on the world?
God: Ah, how can I permit the suffering?
Jerry Landers: Yes!
God: I don't permit the suffering. You do. Free will. All the choices are yours.
Jerry Landers: Choices? What choices?
God: You can love each other, cherish and nurture each other or you can kill each other...

#4
03-14-2014, 10:28 PM
 hothead73 Member SOA Join Date: Sep 2012 Studying for ever Favorite beer: the one I don't remember drinking Posts: 140

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Abraham Weishaus Your first issue has some merit. I will try to improve the wording. Your second issue, though, has little merit. We assume account values are updated annually unless told otherwise. Thus COI would be updated at birthdays. It would be unusual to use a COI for two different ages (e.g. 7.5 and 8.5 to update from year 8 to year 9) for the same year. The COI for the ninth year is based on the probability of death in the 9th year. Of course the payment isn't really made midyear, but this assumption is a convenient approximation for payment at the moment of death.
Thanks, that clears things up. I was thinking of it as a contractual payment date - so that the "beginning" of the year occurs at a midpoint, and so does the end. If it's just a timing assumption for pricing purposes, it makes sense to calculate it the way that the solution says.
__________________
----------

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 AM.

 -- Default Style - Fluid Width ---- Default Style - Fixed Width ---- Old Default Style ---- Easy on the eyes ---- Smooth Darkness ---- Chestnut ---- Apple-ish Style ---- If Apples were blue ---- If Apples were green ---- If Apples were purple ---- Halloween 2007 ---- B&W ---- Halloween ---- AO Christmas Theme ---- Turkey Day Theme ---- AO 2007 beta ---- 4th Of July Contact Us - Actuarial Outpost - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.15928 seconds with 11 queries