Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > CAS > CAS Exams > Exam 8 (old Part 9) - Advanced Ratemaking
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2017, 07:19 PM
Howard Mahler Howard Mahler is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,854
Default Sample Integrated Q Released

See the attachment from the CAS Webpage
Attached Images
File Type: pdf Exam8Sample_Integrative_Question_1.pdf (67.6 KB, 302 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-25-2017, 09:55 AM
FutureActuary II FutureActuary II is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
College: DePaul University
Posts: 237
Default

Any thoughts on the question?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-25-2017, 10:46 AM
mikeman mikeman is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FutureActuary II View Post
Any thoughts on the question?
The model solution for part d) on why you'd prefer a retro is wrong
__________________
Prelims: 1 2 3F MLC 4 | VEE: E F S
Associate: 5 6 | OC1 OC2 COP
Fellow:7 8 9
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-25-2017, 01:18 PM
FutureActuary II FutureActuary II is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
College: DePaul University
Posts: 237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeman View Post
The model solution for part d) on why you'd prefer a retro is wrong
Point number 2 if the Retro is higher than LDD?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-25-2017, 03:27 PM
bjc2142's Avatar
bjc2142 bjc2142 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Boston
Studying for Exam 7
Posts: 574
Default

dang, part d is confusing
__________________
ACAS | 7 | 8 | 9
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-25-2017, 04:05 PM
ALivelySedative's Avatar
ALivelySedative ALivelySedative is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Land of the Pine
College: UNC-Chapel Hill Alum
Favorite beer: Red Oak
Posts: 2,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeman View Post
The model solution for part d) on why you'd prefer a retro is wrong
Quote:
Originally Posted by FutureActuary II View Post
Point number 2 if the Retro is higher than LDD?
Point 1 seems incorrect to me initially. You'd choose the lower premium there since a) it's lower and b) the added safety features should reduce losses and thus reduce the effect of the large deductible anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-25-2017, 04:15 PM
bjc2142's Avatar
bjc2142 bjc2142 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Boston
Studying for Exam 7
Posts: 574
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALivelySedative View Post
Point 1 seems incorrect to me initially. You'd choose the lower premium there since a) it's lower and b) the added safety features should reduce losses and thus reduce the effect of the large deductible anyway.
For this particular problem, in extreme cases the retro seems to win out.

With 0 loss:

LDD: still pay same 332,240 premium. Pay 0 for deductible. Total cost = 332,240
Retro: Ratable loss is 0, so R = B*T = 322,567

This was confusing part to me...they should have asked "calculate expected retro premium" in part c. In part d, we are really comparing (LDD prem+ded payment) vs (actual retro prem after adjustments), while the question is asking why pay higher initial retro premium (or expected retro premium) over lower LDD premium which is fixed. I'm not even sure initial retro premium always equals expected retro premium in practice.
__________________
ACAS | 7 | 8 | 9

Last edited by bjc2142; 09-25-2017 at 04:20 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-25-2017, 04:49 PM
FutureActuary II FutureActuary II is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
College: DePaul University
Posts: 237
Default

Does it seem odd that the paper does not really discuss ways to calculate Modified Expected Loss, but the Case Study and IQ question do so using a hybrid ISO/NCCI method (I know this falls in the realm of something we should be able to do, but it would seem some additional direction on the exam would be fair).

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-26-2017, 10:13 AM
cmoibenlepro's Avatar
cmoibenlepro cmoibenlepro is offline
Member
CAS SOA
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal
Studying for 9
Posts: 1,638
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Mahler View Post
See the attachment from the CAS Webpage
Hello Mr. Mahler, do you have an opinion regarding this question solution?
__________________
SOA: P FM M C FAP1 FA ASA
CAS: OC1 OC2 5 6C ACAS 7 8 9 FCAS
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-26-2017, 11:53 AM
act_123 act_123 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,569
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FutureActuary II View Post
Does it seem odd that the paper does not really discuss ways to calculate Modified Expected Loss, but the Case Study and IQ question do so using a hybrid ISO/NCCI method (I know this falls in the realm of something we should be able to do, but it would seem some additional direction on the exam would be fair).

Thoughts?
Unfortunately, this seems to be the way the CAS has been asking questions recently on Exam 8 and why people struggle with it. Last year they did this with the reinsurance questions.

I contend that this gave reinsurance actuaries an unfair advantage because they had an easier time figuring out these types of adjustments the CAS intended because they have the knowledge of how they would approach those situations.

I agree with you that I don't think part (a) of this question is fair. I think it is on the syllabus enough for the CAS to say it is material covered.

I do like that they are trying to test your understanding of the material and not the memorization of the formulas. However, having candidates make up their own experience modification formula doesn't seem entirely appropriate.
__________________
ACAS 7 8 9

Last edited by act_123; 09-26-2017 at 12:00 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.45590 seconds with 12 queries