Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Pension - Social Security
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Not looking for a job? Tell us about your ideal job,
and we'll only contact you when it opens up.
https://www.dwsimpson.com/register


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2011, 12:44 PM
JMO's Avatar
JMO JMO is offline
Carol Marler
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Back home again in Indiana
Studying for Nothing actuarial.
Posts: 36,745
Default The Future of Social Security

From the SOA Blog Site
http://blog.soa.org/2011/11/08/susta...al-security-2/
Quote:
Reform is necessary, not to help address the deficit issue, but to distribute the pain of some combination of increased taxes and reduced benefits more equitably to all tax-paying generations.
The blog also provides a helpful link to the SS government site and this report. http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v70n3/v70n3p111.html

What I need is a Cliff Notes version that tells me what specific proposals have been made to address the problem.

Raising retirement age for future retirees? Changing the benefit formula in other ways? Switching back to a pure pay-go approach?

How would any of these suggestions (or the real ones on the table) result in a more equitable distribution?

ETA - or if they fail in that objective. Either way, some quantification might help.
__________________
Carol Marler, "Just My Opinion"

Pluto is no longer a planet and I am no longer an actuary. Please take my opinions as non-actuarial.


My latest favorite quotes, updated Feb 15, 2018. Hmmm. It's been quite a while.

Spoiler:
I should keep these four permanently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rekrap View Post
JMO is right
Quote:
Originally Posted by campbell View Post
I agree with JMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westley View Post
And def agree w/ JMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MG View Post
This. And everything else JMO wrote.
And this all purpose permanent quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan View Post
Yup, it is always someone else's fault.
MORE:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeppermintPatty View Post
But sometimes you get someone who has that charming mix of "don't care" and "don't get it", and there's just not much you can do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bro View Post
I recommend you get perspective.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enough Exams Already View Post
Dude, you can't fail a personality test. It just isn't that kind of test.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2011, 02:03 PM
Duffer's Avatar
Duffer Duffer is offline
Member
ASPPA COPA
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Teeing off
Studying for Blues guitar
Posts: 1,493
Default

Sadly, our technical wizardry will not cause SS to improve funding.
There is no direct connection between funding federal elections and funding safety net benefits.
But there have already been plenty of solutions offered. Raise retirement age - yes. Modify cola - yes. Cap on credited earnings for benefit - yes. Forcing the Feds to pay higher interest on the trust fund gimmickry - yes. Raise taxes to return to pure pay-go - yes.
__________________
*Humor Disclaimer: Funny or not, some of the above may be intended as humor. No offense is ever intended, but if offended please accept this disclaimer as a blanket apology. If you remain offended, you’re on your own. Ask your doctor if this humor is right for you. Common side effects include forehead slapping, eye rolling, knee pounding, and occasional gastric symptoms. No TARP funds were used for this disclaimer. If you can get cash for this clunker notify me immediately!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2011, 02:20 PM
Take 2's Avatar
Take 2 Take 2 is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: second estate
Favorite beer: Hires Root
Posts: 4,909
Red face Third Rail

Without major fixes, Medicare benefits will probably be partly funded by T-bills when the trust fund runs out in a few years. I suspect Social Security will follow a few years later. Romney seems the only politician willing to talk about remedies.
__________________
there is no situation so bad that
getting upset won't make it worse
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2011, 04:08 PM
campbell's Avatar
campbell campbell is offline
Mary Pat Campbell
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Studying for duolingo and coursera
Favorite beer: Murphy's Irish Stout
Posts: 80,651
Blog Entries: 6
Default

Well, I started this thread over a couple years ago....

http://www.actuarialoutpost.com/actu...d.php?t=165593

A few things from the Academy:
http://www.actuary.org/pdf/socialsec...ef_6-15-10.pdf

http://actuary.org/pdf/pension/IB_Au...ents_FINAL.pdf
__________________
It's STUMP

LinkedIn Profile
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2011, 05:08 PM
DeepPurple's Avatar
DeepPurple DeepPurple is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,942
Default

I have a question along these lines.

(for the record I am a P&C actuary, and I am just interested in the subject of OASDI from a taxpayer's perspective, not a practicioner, although I think that I have a better understanding of the system as a whole than John Q. Taxpayer)

I believe some sort of "needs testing" will eventually be a part of the reduction of aggregate benefits. In other words, the system's payouts will inevitably migrate from an "entitlement" to a wealth redistribution, transfer system.

The question is, when (not if) this comes in to effect, what will the means test look like? Will it be based on lifetime earnings or will it be based on a calculation of wealth or income at the time retirement benefits are sought?


I have a problem with the concept of reducing one's retirement benefit because he or she had the foresight to make personal savings a lifetime choice.
__________________
Come on. Let's go space truckin'. Come on!

Last edited by DeepPurple; 11-09-2011 at 05:11 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2011, 05:27 PM
campbell's Avatar
campbell campbell is offline
Mary Pat Campbell
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Studying for duolingo and coursera
Favorite beer: Murphy's Irish Stout
Posts: 80,651
Blog Entries: 6
Default

If you don't want to wallow through an almost-800-post thread, you can start here for some discussion
http://www.actuarialoutpost.com/actu...76#post5244976
__________________
It's STUMP

LinkedIn Profile
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2011, 11:18 PM
DanielSong39 DanielSong39 is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
College: Caltech, Class of 2000
Posts: 6,267
Default

Past generations got much more from Social Security than they put in.

The current generation is getting much less from Social Security than past generations.

Future generations will get much less money from Social Security than they will put in.

So why can't people admit that the system is broken and actually make some big changes?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2011, 11:38 PM
Colymbosathon ecplecticos's Avatar
Colymbosathon ecplecticos Colymbosathon ecplecticos is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,758
Default

Maybe it isn't as bad a deal as you seem to think. Here is a post I made last year sometime:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colymbosathon ecplecticos View Post
Ok.

It looks like you agree that we should pay some smallish stipend to the elderly to keep them from starving. Now there are several ways to so that, we could require that they request it based on need. The trouble is then we would need to figure out who is truly needy --- this would add large administrative costs and create a large opportunity for fraud. I have an idea, let's give the minimum benefit to everybody, that way we don't need to have means testing and fraud is less of an issue. Of course this will cost more than only giving the stipend to the needy, so it might not look like a good deal to the more wealthy, but that is only because they ignore the cost of not having the program. While we are at it, we should probably add some disability and survivor benefits since young people really need these and few can afford it. They will pay for the coverage later if they don't go on claim, something that private insurance simply cannot do. Presto, social security today.
__________________
"What do you mean I don't have the prerequisites for this class? I've failed it twice before!"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-09-2011, 11:40 PM
DanielSong39 DanielSong39 is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
College: Caltech, Class of 2000
Posts: 6,267
Default

If Social Security was changed into a voluntary, direct contribution, 401K-like plan I would have zero complaints.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2011, 11:51 PM
Colymbosathon ecplecticos's Avatar
Colymbosathon ecplecticos Colymbosathon ecplecticos is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,758
Default

Would you be happy to pay the additional income tax needed to fund the safety net for seniors? Today the cost is carried by the system; presumably it would come from the general fund in your scheme.
__________________
"What do you mean I don't have the prerequisites for this class? I've failed it twice before!"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.28158 seconds with 9 queries