Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Property - Casualty / General Insurance
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Fill in a brief DW Simpson Registration Form
to be contacted when new jobs meet your criteria.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-11-2017, 05:15 PM
CheapActuary CheapActuary is offline
Member
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 51
Exclamation AmTrust Watch Thread

https://seekingalpha.com/article/405...-loss-reserves

Quote:
Summary

AmTrust has consistently underestimated ultimate losses for every accident year since 2009.

AmTrust has masked these accident year adverse developments by taking down the most recent accident years, and then pushing those very same AYs up later.

2015 Calendar Year adverse development of $34 million was masked by pulling down reserves by $150 million from the 2014 AY.

AmTrust Financial Services (NASDAQ:AFSI) is a property casualty insurance company that writes primarily small business commercial insurance. This company has grown faster and printed better numbers than anyone in the industry. Along with this success has been many calls that the numbers are extremely inflated. This author agrees that the numbers are inflated and this article will touch on the far and away most important aspect of AFSI's earnings, the P&C loss reserves.

With the massive drop in stock price over the past month because of the delay in the 10K filing, many value investors may be salivating over potentially very low earnings multiples. Unfortunately those earnings are highly sensitive to loss reserve estimates which management has large discretion to adjust.

For those individuals whom are not familiar with insurance accounting, it is markedly different than in other industries due to the cost of goods (insurance) not being known at the time of sale, but rather many years later. This leads to management's estimates of future losses having a large impact on a company's earnings from quarter to quarter and year to year.

With the recent 10K delay (which is the first year-end after the insurance regulators forced AFSI to get a new auditor), what we find through management disclosure is that they were having problems getting the easy stuff correct: not following very clear black and white revenue recognition rules. Given that they were very aggressive on accounting numbers where the rules were black and white, it would suggest to any rational investor that the company would be aggressive with the levers that aren't black and white and can -legally- be played around with (loss reserves).

For the optimists and AmTrust employees out there that think they played around with revenue recognition but were honest with their loss reserves, I present below the accident year reserve development triangle that is calculated directly from AFSI's 10K published in early 2016.



AFSI's 2015 Calendar Year adverse reserve development was $34 million, however they brought down their most recent accident year by $150 million, otherwise the charge would have been $184 million. There is a clear pattern, pull down the most recent accident year to smooth calendar year results, and then reverse that favorable development in later periods (this happened 4 years in a row!).

Author's humble opinion: Everything you see in this table is grossly outside the bounds of normal loss reserving.

AmTrust's prior auditor, BDO, is relatively unknown in the insurance world, which is why the insurance regulators forced AmTrust to get a new auditor (AFSI picked KPMG). AmTrust's loss reserves prior to this year were consulted out to a 3rd party named Huggins Actuarial Services, which is an unknown shop where AmTrust is their biggest P&C reserving client.

I have no idea whether Huggins is doing AFSI's reserves this year and don't care to look it up as I no longer follow this stuff closely (feel free to add this information to the comments).

And so where to go from here?

Author's speculation: What is likely at the center of discussions between AmTrust and KPMG is NOT revenue recognition or other miscellaneous accounting items, but rather those big elephants: loss reserves. Management's stated $65 million calendar year reserve charge in 2016 likely includes a MASSIVE offsetting pull down of the 2015 Accident Year reserves, just like we have seen in the table above.

Tower Group (NASDAQ:TWGP) ended because of one reason: PWC forced TWGP to push their reserves up.

What will KPMG do when faced with an even more exaggerated situation?

For investors looking to play the stock, right now this is purely a regulatory/accounting issue. With a stroke of a pen from KPMG this stock could move up or down 50%+. Even if the value ultimately is well below the current stock price, if AmTrust manages to release their 10K with no serious adverse development above the $65 million already disclosed, then this stock will likely see a large bump upward.

Unfortunately I do not know the moral code of the KPMG auditors tasked with auditing AFSI, so I don't have an investment recommendation for you. What we all should find interesting is that in the very moment when investors need the advice on whether to buy or sell as this is a highly volatile moment, several sell side analysts that previously were perma-outperform for many years have "suspended coverage" until they can see reliable financial statements.

Disclosure: I/we have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Last edited by CheapActuary; 04-11-2017 at 05:34 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2017, 05:23 PM
yoyo's Avatar
yoyo yoyo is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 22,185
Default

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2017, 05:26 PM
yoyo's Avatar
yoyo yoyo is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 22,185
Default

CheapActuary, can you post that article for us? I can't get past the registration nag screen on page 2 (of 3).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2017, 05:49 PM
r. mutt's Avatar
r. mutt r. mutt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Extreme fever swamps of the left
Posts: 10,182
Default

Having dealt extensively with part of their group in the past, I am neither surprised nor saddened.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yoyo View Post
CheapActuary, can you post that article for us? I can't get past the registration nag screen on page 2 (of 3).
Registering is both free and useful.
__________________
Bruce
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2017, 05:51 PM
redearedslider's Avatar
redearedslider redearedslider is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,389
Default

That is a pretty interesting triangle
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abraham Weishaus View Post
ASM does not have a discussion of stimulation, but considering how boring the manual is, maybe it would be a good idea.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2017, 05:57 PM
Abelian Grape's Avatar
Abelian Grape Abelian Grape is offline
Meme-ber                         Meme-ber
CAS
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Favorite beer: Allagash Curieux
Posts: 41,597
Default

We're already watching it in CS's group btw
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-11-2017, 06:55 PM
YetAnotherCareerChanger's Avatar
YetAnotherCareerChanger YetAnotherCareerChanger is online now
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,030
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abelian Grape View Post
We're already watching it in CS's group btw
Not everyone participates in social groups. Some of us know nothing about social groups.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-11-2017, 06:58 PM
Abelian Grape's Avatar
Abelian Grape Abelian Grape is offline
Meme-ber                         Meme-ber
CAS
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Favorite beer: Allagash Curieux
Posts: 41,597
Default

How've u been
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-11-2017, 07:03 PM
JMO's Avatar
JMO JMO is offline
Carol Marler
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Back home again in Indiana
Studying for Nothing actuarial.
Posts: 37,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abelian Grape View Post
How've u been
atgtf
Shouldn't that be down in Cyberchat?
__________________
Carol Marler, "Just My Opinion"

Pluto is no longer a planet and I am no longer an actuary. Please take my opinions as non-actuarial.


My latest favorite quotes, updated Apr 5, 2018.

Spoiler:
I should keep these four permanently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rekrap View Post
JMO is right
Quote:
Originally Posted by campbell View Post
I agree with JMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westley View Post
And def agree w/ JMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MG View Post
This. And everything else JMO wrote.
And this all purpose permanent quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan View Post
Yup, it is always someone else's fault.
MORE:
All purpose response for careers forum:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctorNo View Post
Depends upon the employer and the situation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sredni Vashtar View Post
I feel like ERM is 90% buzzwords, and that the underlying agenda is to make sure at least one of your Corporate Officers is not dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-11-2017, 08:03 PM
redearedslider's Avatar
redearedslider redearedslider is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,389
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abelian Grape View Post
How've u been
thanks, you too
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abraham Weishaus View Post
ASM does not have a discussion of stimulation, but considering how boring the manual is, maybe it would be a good idea.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.32559 seconds with 9 queries