Actuarial Outpost
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Pension - Social Security
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Fill in a brief DW Simpson Registration Form
to be contacted when new jobs meet your criteria.

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-05-2014, 09:43 AM
campbell's Avatar
campbell campbell is offline
Mary Pat Campbell
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
Studying for duolingo and coursera
Favorite beer: Murphy's Irish Stout
Posts: 85,616
Blog Entries: 6


Wilmington, Del. • A Delaware bankruptcy judge is weighing a request by Trump Entertainment Resorts to get out of its pension obligations under a collective bargaining agreement with union workers at the Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

Trump Entertainment sought bankruptcy protection last month, struggling with cash-flow problems amid competition from new casinos in neighboring states. It has threatened to close the Taj Mahal and lay off almost 3,000 workers in mid-November if it can’t win concessions from union workers.

Billionaire Carl Icahn, the company’s senior secured lender, has tentatively agreed to Trump Entertainment’s request to convert his $288 million secured debt into a 100 percent ownership stake in a reorganized company and to inject $100 million in equity to keep the company going.

But his offer is contingent on the company obtaining significant concessions from the union and steep tax breaks from local and state officials in New Jersey.

Gross had scheduled an Oct. 14 hearing on Trump Entertainment’s request for permission to terminate the collective bargaining agreement as part of an effort to reorganize and avoid closing the Taj Mahal, which could become the fifth Atlantic City casino to shut its doors this year.

But after unsuccessful attempts to persuade the union to accept concessions, including replacing the pension plan with a 401(k) plan, Trump attorneys asked the judge this week to rule separately and quickly on the pension liability.

Company representatives say they are burning through the little operating cash they have and can’t afford to continue pension contributions of $300,000 a month.


LinkedIn Profile
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 1.24668 seconds with 11 queries