Actuarial Outpost
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Probability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Probability Old Exam P Forum

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-15-2018, 07:58 AM
Mitsu96 Mitsu96 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Pennsylvania
Studying for IFM
Posts: 69
Default SOA Sample Question #309

Hello everyone,

I am struggling with this question (SOA 309):

Name:  Screen Shot 2018-07-15 at 3.47.59 PM.jpg
Views: 393
Size:  24.7 KB

The answer is 5/4.

The solution provided by SOA states that X and Y are the two coordinates of a resident. Thus, the distance to the origin is X + Y, following which the E[X + Y] is calculated. While, I understand how to calculate E[X + Y], I can't understand why or how X and Y are the coordinates of a resident and the distance to the origin is X + Y??
Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2018, 08:31 AM
Gandalf's Avatar
Gandalf Gandalf is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 31,179

You need to be more specific about what you don't understand by saying what you do understand or what conclusions you are drawing from the given information.

"Two sides of the square (of side 1) are on the positive axes". From that, you should conclude that coordinates of the square's corner on the x-axis are (x,0) and (x+1,0) for some value of x. Since it is a square (of side 1), the other two coordinates must be at (x,1) and (x+1,1) [or conceivably (x, -1) and (x+1, -1)]

Similarly, you should conclude that coordinates of the square on the y-axis are (0, y) and (0,y+1) for some value of y). Since it is a square (of side 1), the other two coordinates must be at (1,y) and (1,y+1) [or conceivably (-1, y) and (-1, y+1)]

But there are only 4 corners, so both descriptions must match the same 4 corners. Can you come up with any combination that works besides (0,0), (0,1), (1,0), (1,1)?

[You should reach that conclusion much easier from the density function, which is clearly nonzero only on that particular square, plus the location of the city hall, which presumably is going to be within the square. You might have expected that the city hall would be at the center, but the density function makes that unreasonable.]

If he can travel only on segments parallel to the axes, the it should be obvious that the shortest travel distance from (x,y) to (0,0) is x+y. [It would be pretty far-fetched to argue that an actual resident might not take the shortest route; for example going from (x,y) to (x,1), then to (0,1), then to (0,0).] There are many variations of the shortest route, for example (x,y) to (.5x,y) to (.5x,.3y) to (0,.3y), to (0,0), but all those variations have length x=y.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2018, 10:45 AM
Michael Mastroianni's Avatar
Michael Mastroianni Michael Mastroianni is offline
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 35

Perhaps this picture will help:
Michael Mastroianni, ASA
Video Course for Exam 1/P:
Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2018, 11:07 AM
Academic Actuary Academic Actuary is offline
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,578

This distance measure is sometimes referred to as the Manhattan metric. If you are on a grid and can only move parallel to the axes your distance from a point (x,y), to a point (xo,yo) is |x - xo| + |y-yo|. The technical name is the L1 norm while the traditional straight line distance where you square the differences and take the square root is the Euclidian distance or L2 norm.
Reply With Quote

expectation, joint distribution

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.15716 seconds with 12 queries