Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > General Actuarial
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

DW Simpson
Actuarial Jobs

Visit our site for the most up to date jobs for actuaries.

Actuarial Salary Surveys
Property & Casualty, Health, Life, Pension and Non-Tradtional Jobs.

Actuarial Meeting Schedule
Browse this year's meetings and which recruiters will attend.

Contact DW Simpson
Have a question?
Let's talk.
You'll be glad you did.


General Actuarial Non-Specific Actuarial Topics - Before posting a thread, please browse over our other sections to see if there is a better fit, such as Careers - Employment, Actuarial Science Universities Forum or any of our other 100+ forums.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-21-2018, 10:45 AM
JMO's Avatar
JMO JMO is offline
Carol Marler
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Back home again in Indiana
Studying for Nothing actuarial.
Posts: 37,428
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by actuaryleaks101 View Post
The next installment is on its way.
Are you ready folks??????????


Unsubscribe
__________________
Carol Marler, "Just My Opinion"

Pluto is no longer a planet and I am no longer an actuary. Please take my opinions as non-actuarial.


My latest favorite quotes, updated Apr 5, 2018.

Spoiler:
I should keep these four permanently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rekrap View Post
JMO is right
Quote:
Originally Posted by campbell View Post
I agree with JMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westley View Post
And def agree w/ JMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MG View Post
This. And everything else JMO wrote.
And this all purpose permanent quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan View Post
Yup, it is always someone else's fault.
MORE:
All purpose response for careers forum:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctorNo View Post
Depends upon the employer and the situation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sredni Vashtar View Post
I feel like ERM is 90% buzzwords, and that the underlying agenda is to make sure at least one of your Corporate Officers is not dumb.
  #42  
Old 06-21-2018, 10:59 AM
actuaryleaks101 actuaryleaks101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
College: Imperial
Posts: 68
Default

In the meantime, here is the particulars of the claim against them
  #43  
Old 06-21-2018, 11:03 AM
actuaryleaks101 actuaryleaks101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
College: Imperial
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMO View Post


Unsubscribe
Listen love, I am not a troll
  #44  
Old 06-21-2018, 11:37 AM
GargoyleWaiting's Avatar
GargoyleWaiting GargoyleWaiting is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Favorite beer: the closest one
Posts: 6,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by actuaryleaks101 View Post
In the meantime, here is the particulars of the claim against them
So, to summarise, the alleged victimisation is that the IFoA deliberately failed the claimant's SA2 exam sitting? And this is based on an email saying "we have nothing to send him" in regard to his detailed exam results, and another where they said they'll "keep a watch" on his exam progress.

Am I missing anything there?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFActuary View Post
But the mosquitoes in New Brunswick Bay of Fundy did mess with my understanding of some limited loss functions
Quote:
Originally Posted by King of the North View Post
Excel gave me #VALUE.

Edit: Nevermind, I was linking a sumif and didn't open the linked spreadsheet. It is now giving me #N/A.
  #45  
Old 06-21-2018, 11:40 AM
actuaryleaks101 actuaryleaks101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
College: Imperial
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GargoyleWaiting View Post
So, to summarise, the alleged victimisation is that the IFoA deliberately failed the claimant's SA2 exam sitting? And this is based on an email saying "we have nothing to send him" in regard to his detailed exam results, and another where they said they'll "keep a watch" on his exam progress.

Am I missing anything there?
Nope. The fact of the matter is that they had marks for all of the other students except him.. (To the best of my knowledge)
  #46  
Old 06-21-2018, 11:41 AM
actuaryleaks101 actuaryleaks101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
College: Imperial
Posts: 68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GargoyleWaiting View Post
So, to summarise, the alleged victimisation is that the IFoA deliberately failed the claimant's SA2 exam sitting? And this is based on an email saying "we have nothing to send him" in regard to his detailed exam results, and another where they said they'll "keep a watch" on his exam progress.

Am I missing anything there?
out of 20 thousand students, why do they need to keep a watch on one student out of that 20,000 cohort???? Sounds a bit fishy
  #47  
Old 06-21-2018, 11:42 AM
GargoyleWaiting's Avatar
GargoyleWaiting GargoyleWaiting is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Favorite beer: the closest one
Posts: 6,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by actuaryleaks101 View Post
Nope. The fact of the matter is that they had marks for all of the other students except him.. (To the best of my knowledge)
What do you base that on?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFActuary View Post
But the mosquitoes in New Brunswick Bay of Fundy did mess with my understanding of some limited loss functions
Quote:
Originally Posted by King of the North View Post
Excel gave me #VALUE.

Edit: Nevermind, I was linking a sumif and didn't open the linked spreadsheet. It is now giving me #N/A.
  #48  
Old 06-21-2018, 11:43 AM
almost_there almost_there is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 115
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GargoyleWaiting View Post
Am I missing anything there?
Quite a lot actually
  #49  
Old 06-21-2018, 11:58 AM
GargoyleWaiting's Avatar
GargoyleWaiting GargoyleWaiting is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Favorite beer: the closest one
Posts: 6,697
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by almost_there View Post
Quite a lot actually
Thanks for your useful input.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFActuary View Post
But the mosquitoes in New Brunswick Bay of Fundy did mess with my understanding of some limited loss functions
Quote:
Originally Posted by King of the North View Post
Excel gave me #VALUE.

Edit: Nevermind, I was linking a sumif and didn't open the linked spreadsheet. It is now giving me #N/A.
  #50  
Old 06-21-2018, 11:59 AM
GargoyleWaiting's Avatar
GargoyleWaiting GargoyleWaiting is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Favorite beer: the closest one
Posts: 6,697
Default

Right, the timeline is all over the place in the doc, so is this the right order of events?


June 2011 – Claimant complains of discrimination due to different exam fees
July 2011 – unhappy with response, claimant refers issue to EHRC
January 2012 – Claimant sits CA3 exam
April 2012 – EHRC makes contact with IFoA re discrimination
April 2012 – Claimant sits SA2 exam
April 2012 – Claimant informed he has failed CA3 exam
April 2012 – Claimant issues SAR to IFoA to obtain detailed CA3 exam results
April 2012 – IfoA staff members says in email they will “keep a watch” on Claimants SA2 exam progress
May 2012 – Claimant receives detailed mark breakdown for failed CA3 exam
July 2012 – Claimant informed he has failed SA2 exam
July 2012 – Claimant issues SAR to IFoA to try to obtain detailed exam results
July/August 2012 – IFoA staff via email say the have “no marks” to share with Claimain
August 2012 – Exam result provided, but in no more detail than original
Later 2012 – Claimant gets exam counselling review of SA2 exam which he is not happy with


August 2017 – Claimant writes to IFoA questioning current situation
October 2017 – Claimant told to focus questions on the IFoA rather than individuals
October 2017 – Claimant told that making allegations of professional misconduct without evidence is a breach of the actuaries code
November 2017 – Claimant told questions have been forwarded to legal team
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFActuary View Post
But the mosquitoes in New Brunswick Bay of Fundy did mess with my understanding of some limited loss functions
Quote:
Originally Posted by King of the North View Post
Excel gave me #VALUE.

Edit: Nevermind, I was linking a sumif and didn't open the linked spreadsheet. It is now giving me #N/A.

Last edited by GargoyleWaiting; 06-21-2018 at 12:09 PM.. Reason: CA3, not SA3
Closed Thread

Tags
acted, britain, ehrc, ifoa, racism, victimisation

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.41983 seconds with 9 queries