Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Careers - Employment
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

DW Simpson Global Actuarial & Analytcs Recruitment
Download our 2016 Actuarial Salary Survey
now with state-by-state salary information!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-31-2015, 10:35 PM
kimjongfun kimjongfun is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 675
Default I think the threat of automation is greater than we think

I have found some previous threads talking about the risk of automation for the actuarial career, but its mostly a debate about how the type of work we are doing will shift or how it will be more programming based, etc.

I think the points made in those threads are all valid and I think Colonel Smoothie is right that we will need to learn more and more technical skills going forward.

However I do not think our biggest risk is being replaced by machines or automation for our jobs. I think our biggest risk comes from everyone else's jobs being automated.

It is estimated that around 50% of the jobs in America will be automated and eliminated over the next 20 years. This will drastically hurt the demand for our products and therefore us as an extension.

What is the purpose of life insurance? To cover current indebtedness and replace estimated future earnings of a breadwinner. - If a lot less people are working and being breadwinners there will be lower demand for life insurance. They will be on the government dole instead.

We all know pensions are on there way out, no need to comment there.

With health we will see fewer people working and thus fewer people being covered by employer provided insurance and again, more people relying on the government. This will only accelerate calls for single payer takeover of healthcare.

With P&C obviously driverless cars decrease demand for car insurance, and homeowners insurance will be hurt by fewer people being able to buy a home and make the payments. This may give a slight boost to renters insurance, but that's a drop in the bucket comparatively.

Fewer workers means less workers comp coverage. Fewer vacations means less travel insurance... you could go on and on about how the replacement of the need for people drastically reduces the amount of risk out there and the demand for the products designed for people to hedge against that risk.

Last edited by kimjongfun; 01-31-2015 at 11:34 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2015, 10:44 PM
AbedNadir AbedNadir is offline
Member
CAS SOA
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Studying for enlightenment
Posts: 1,725
Default

If I met a guy who stopped pursuing the actuarial track because he feared for his job security in the face of increased automation I'd think he was out of his mind lol

actually my initial reaction would be to think that he couldn't do exams and was lying about his real reason for stopping and if I pressed him and determined he was serious I'd be a little wierded out
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonel Smoothie View Post
Maybe, if there were some magical 4th dimension where they did their work in hypercubicles. Otherwise, I don't see them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-31-2015, 10:49 PM
Kanye West's Avatar
Kanye West Kanye West is offline
Member
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
College: American Academy of Art - Dropout
Posts: 810
Default

Actuarial work isn't going anywhere for the next 30 years. Best advice I can muster is if you're considering P&C don't paint yourself into a corner by being a one-trick pony. Do some personal lines and commercial lines work early in your career. Learn reserving and pricing work, maybe join a consultancy. Joining a predictive modeling department will give you the option to switch industries down the road if it really does all go belly up.

Be like water. -Bruce Lee
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-01-2015, 12:41 AM
Yamamay Yamamay is offline
Member
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kimjongfun View Post
Fewer workers
This is where you're wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2015, 01:08 AM
nonlnear nonlnear is offline
Member
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: May 2010
Favorite beer: Civil Society Fresh IPA
Posts: 26,445
Default

The real question is why you are even bothering to think about the threat of automation at all. The singularity will make all human thought moot, when even that will be automated.

We're all just part of the prequel to the illustrious history of our robotic overlords. Why sweat the details?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2015, 01:34 AM
jesusislord jesusislord is offline
Member
CAS AAA
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,462
Default

Automation may eliminate jobs but new ones will be created just as quickly. clearly you need a refresher in real analysis
__________________
God is real and His love is unconditional.

Last edited by jesusislord; 02-01-2015 at 01:37 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-01-2015, 01:35 AM
Abelian Grape's Avatar
Abelian Grape Abelian Grape is offline
Meme-ber                         Meme-ber
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Commuter
Studying for Viticulture dissertation
College: Grape and Wine Institute
Favorite beer: Wine
Posts: 34,582
Default

dat slippery slope way of thinking
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-01-2015, 11:54 AM
Fracktuary Fracktuary is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,464
Default

Everyone concerned with the effects of automation should read the book "The Second Machine Age".

In it they tell the story of deep blue, the computer that was unbeatable by any human.

So for many years no human could straight up beat the computer program. Until somebody decided to pair a good chess player with a mediocre computer. The combination easily beat the best computer simulation. Kind of a random story, but my point is that automation and computers open up a new realm of possibility for those who can wield them.

A decent human + good software > the best software in the world. Technology creates more opportunity than it destroys.

Last edited by Fracktuary; 02-01-2015 at 11:57 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-01-2015, 11:55 AM
Abelian Grape's Avatar
Abelian Grape Abelian Grape is offline
Meme-ber                         Meme-ber
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Commuter
Studying for Viticulture dissertation
College: Grape and Wine Institute
Favorite beer: Wine
Posts: 34,582
Default

effects*
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-01-2015, 12:02 PM
Ito's Phlegm's Avatar
Ito's Phlegm Ito's Phlegm is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Favorite beer: free
Posts: 11,842
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jesusislord View Post
Automation may eliminate jobs but new ones will be created just as quickly. clearly you need a refresher in real analysis
Will they?

How many workers displaced by automation can fill the new jobs created to develop automation? I don't think it's 1:1, probably much less.
__________________
ASA
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.20588 seconds with 10 queries