Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Cyberchat > Diversions > Bridge
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Salary Surveys
Property & Casualty, Life, Health & Pension

Health Actuary Jobs
Insurance & Consulting jobs for Students, Associates & Fellows

Actuarial Recruitment
Visit DW Simpson's website for more info.
www.dwsimpson.com/about

Casualty Jobs
Property & Casualty jobs for Students, Associates & Fellows


Bridge Sub-Forums: Frequency and Severity

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2017, 02:51 PM
Steve White Steve White is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,341
Default 2018 MSC

January problems. Deadline Dec 10 at 11am EST. Let's get the new year off to a strong start.
Attached Images
File Type: pdf mscproblemset201801.pdf (115.7 KB, 127 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-13-2017, 07:36 AM
oirg oirg is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,608
Default

January guesses - I found these to be very tough, not sure about any of them.

A. pass
B. 1S
C. 2S
D. pass
E. double
F. pass
G. 3S
H. spade queen
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2017, 09:58 AM
Klaymen's Avatar
Klaymen Klaymen is online now
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Studying for this space for rent
Posts: 19,993
Default

A. 3
B. 2
C. 3
D. 2
E. 5
F. pass
G. 3
H. 9

Nice to see how few we agree on already. I might pay the price for taking the glass is half-full approach.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2017, 02:18 PM
Numbers Nerd's Avatar
Numbers Nerd Numbers Nerd is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Midwest
College: University of Wisconsin
Favorite beer: Ale, Lager, you name it
Posts: 1,684
Default

Shall we assume that our group effort to participate in the MSC as Expert Solvers won't be until 2019 or 2020? That is, these 2018 solutions will be handled just as in prior years.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2017, 02:39 PM
Klaymen's Avatar
Klaymen Klaymen is online now
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Studying for this space for rent
Posts: 19,993
Default

Why wouldn't we just start participating immediately?
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2017, 03:10 PM
Steve White Steve White is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,341
Default

We should do this month the normal way. We are not panelists this month. I believe the current procedure is that our term as panelists will be three months. It's definitely less that one year. We may not get the problems we are to answer until January. Jeff's e-mail said we would get them between Dec 5 and Jan 25. Jan 25 means the earliest they could be would be the March problems, and their lead time might be longer than that. The calendar quarter Apr - June may be likely. His e-mail said we would get three e-mails with links to the problems to answer, tending to confirm that our term is three months.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-02-2017, 08:16 AM
kmbrunskill kmbrunskill is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 403
Default

Spoiler:

A - pass. I'm so close to 3NT. Maybe with another diamond
B - 2C
C - 3NT. Partner could be 3 hearts no?
D - I hate every bid here. So I'm going to pass
E - 3NT
F - pass
G - pass
H - 9D

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-02-2017, 08:38 AM
Been There Done That Been There Done That is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 922
Default

Have we decided who's going to submit our group solutions this year?

I'm willing to do it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-02-2017, 10:25 AM
Steve White Steve White is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,341
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Been There Done That View Post
Have we decided who's going to submit our group solutions this year?

I'm willing to do it.
I'm assuming I will, since I want to be submitting the consensus answers the months I'm an official panelist. If you or someone else prefers to submit the consensus answers in other months (in all months including those), that's fine with me. I can submit my own answers in the other months. The January problems look awful, so I'm not confident about what that either my answers or the consensus answers will score well.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-02-2017, 11:11 AM
Steve White Steve White is offline
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,341
Default

January answers. I started thinking about these the day I posted the questions. I even started drafting my choices and reasoning. Now I know why I didn't post or save them, though as I recall most of these are how I felt then.
Spoiler:
A. 3NT. Hamman's rule. 3S is my second choice, but on a 4-card suit seems too extreme. Pass is certainly a possibility since it's matchpoints.
B. 1S. Either this or 2C (and I see the other votes agree those are the choices).
C. 3C. With such a strong hand I think I've got to bid again, and with 2=3 in the majors I'm not going to support a major yet. Second choice 3D.
D. P. Initially thought about bidding a major, but would have to decide which major, and don't see that we gain much if I do. Considered 2NT, but not enough playing strength to justify that.
E. 3NT. Hamman's rule. Second choice 4D
F. 1C. Don't you prefer to make the auction a little tougher for the opps, especially if you can encourage the lead you suspect is best. Even if 1C doesn't take a bid he would want to make away from LHO - and he might well want to open 1C - bidding after an overcall is less defined that auctions starting with an opening bid.
G. 3C. I think it's worth inviting a game. No strong feelings about 3C vs 3D - I would be happy if he accepted either, and with 2 missing club honors he may be more likely to accept 3C. My main reason for picking 3C is that if he wants to be noncommittal over 3C he could bid 3D (I would bid game) or 3H (I would not). 3H by him over 3D would not be as committal.
H. H7. Any suit could be right. I'm sure I wouldn't lead this at the table, from a 4-card suit into declarer's first bid suit, with a partner who will have very little. It could pay off big, e.g. partner having the Q with the 10 dummy. That's unlikely though, and as I type the "reasoning" I realize that with two side aces I may not need to lead the suit at trick one. I certainly do not if partner has the Q and dummy the 10. So this is likely the last time I'll have anything good to say about a heart lead.


Answers so far
Code:
                 A     B     C     D     E     F     G     H
oirg             P    1S    2S     P   Dbl     P    3S    SQ
SW             3NT    1S    3C    2D   3NT    1C    3C    H7
Klaymen         3H    2C    3D    2D    5D     P    3C    D9
ST                                                          
BTDT                                                        
NN                                                          
kmbrunskill      P    2C   3NT     P   3NT     P     P    D9
mathmajor                                                   
4 Sigma                                                     
bill18                                                      
Leading                                        P
Only one leader (requires at least 3 votes) so far.

I'm odd man out on it (F). It's one of the two I feel most confident of my choice. I don't think 1C is a lot better than P but do expect that the panel will find 1C better. Is it possible that the 4-card diamond suit will take too many votes away from the 3-card club suit? That could happen, and they probably expect a split among P, 1C and 1D. I can't see P getting a majority and think 1C might, but if 1D does well then P might take the plurality.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.58204 seconds with 12 queries