Actuarial Outpost
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Health - Disability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2017, 06:31 PM
Take 2's Avatar
Take 2 Take 2 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: second estate
Favorite beer: Hires Root
Posts: 4,922
Question C3 RBC Health-Only Company

I've searched, can't find an exemption for filing Risk-Based Capital C-3 Component, Appointed Actuary Assumption Statement for a health-only company. It doesn't seem universally applicable to health (but I won't claim a lot of experience). Would appointed actuaries for companies with LTC or LTD need to provide this?
there is no situation so bad that
getting upset won't make it worse
Reply With Quote

appointed actuary, c-3, health, rbc, risk-based capital

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.20474 seconds with 9 queries