

FlashChat  Actuarial Discussion  Preliminary Exams  CAS/SOA Exams  Cyberchat  Around the World  Suggestions 
Investment / Financial Markets Old Exam MFE Forum 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 
#1




This Irks Me
Why do they do this? Take for example SOA 69, a question about determining theta under a binomial model.
I can do this problem. This is simply a problem of mechanical calculation. If you have studied the material, this would seem to be a fairly straightforward application of how we determine theta in a binomial model. In 9 out of 10 problems I have seen, when I get an answer say 0.625, I would expect to see the solution as either 0.625, or 0.63, depending on how they were rounding their answers. I have trained myself that if I'm not exact in my solution, meaning the rounding is off, then I have made an error, and this is a tip to me to go back and be more careful. Here, there correct answer is 0.6244 something. My point is if you don't carry your intermediate values all the way through, you can easily get 0.625, and like me, since 9 out of 10 times you can round to the number of decimal places the solution gives and you will come to the right solution, here, I would have wasted time going back and second guessing myself because I didn't have exactly 0.625 or 0.63. Does anyone else feel this is an inconsistency, if so, this question seems to be more of a problem about rounding than it does about applying the material. I don't get what the point is. 
#2




I'm guessing it's because problems are written by different volunteers and each has his/her preference. With the ability to store values in a calculator why would you round at all?
The only time I have rounded was when using the normal table. 
#3




To be honest, in this problem you are pricing an american put, and for me I cant remember every value and where it is stored in my calculator.
I would just like it if some of the little things like that weren't an issue, it is a waste to get stuck on a problem because of the rounding. I mean, everyone says how accurate and critical actuaries must be in the real world. How the mistake of adding or missing a zero in a calculation dealing with a small number could have a ripple effect and be a serious mistake. All of that is good and dandy, but if these exams are to test my aptitude to see if I can indeed do that in the real world, it would seem to me that actuaries creating the exams should be as critical in developing their questions as they are on the job. I know your going to say their volunteers and everyone makes mistakes, but it seems a little careless on their end. Just a gripe, thats all. 
#4




Sometimes accuracy is not always the key to every answer, but the relevance of a value. I can say that there will never be an accurate answer. Certain quarters prefer the use of more decimal points, while others would prefer to use constant number of decimal points (like only 6 decimal places throughout the whole process, for every value obtained).
Just saying that if accuracy is very important, we would not see widespread use of simulation and analysis, but many would waste time solving differential equations. Perhaps we may find an explicit solution of .
__________________
ASA: FSA: FETE Last edited by chronoz5707; 12062010 at 09:43 PM.. 
#5




Quote:
Thanks 
#6




Quote:

#8




Correct. The proof is pretty cool, but sadly is one of those things I no longer know.

#9




Piece of advice: skip American option questions on the exam unless you have a lot of extra time. They take forever.
__________________
Who would win in a fight...Mike Ditka or a hurricane? And da hurricane's name is Ditka. 
#10




Then again, since MFE tests a lot on theory, questions with definitive answers are almost like gimmes. I suck with theory, so I saved the American option questions after I put in my guesses for the theory questions .
__________________

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  

