Actuarial Outpost
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Life
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Not looking for a job? Tell us about your ideal job,
and we'll only contact you when it opens up.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2017, 05:27 PM
fastcount fastcount is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 85
Default XXX and AXXX reserving


What is the purpose of checking for the creation of new segments?
I know how the calculation works, I would just like to know the thinking/rationale behind it.

Also, what's the rationale behind having XXX and AXXX, isn't XXX enough?

Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2017, 06:27 PM
Sleeping Dragon Sleeping Dragon is offline
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 125

Under pre-XXX, companies could reduce reserves by creating gross premium increases from one policy year to the next. The reserve = PV benefits less PV of net premium. Since the net premium is a constant percent of the gross premium, you can reduce the reserves in the early years by making the gross premiums in the later year very high without segmentation. By making the gross premiums very high in later years, policyholders are more likely to lapse the policy when the premium charges increase.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2017, 05:59 PM
E's Avatar
E E is online now
Eddie Smith
Join Date: May 2003
College: UGA
Posts: 8,857

XXX is a highly conservative fix for an inherent problem in traditional stat reserves: there is no explicit lapse assumption in US stat. Therefore companies can use very high premium scales to wipe out reserves without accounting for the reality of shock lapses when premiums go sky high. XXX basically breaks a term policy into a series of term policies corresponding to different premium slopes. The classic example is level term, then ART. The level term is segment 1, and subsequent segments are based on the annual premium. This ensures that the ART premiums do not affect (lower) the reserve for segment 1.

AXXX is difficult to describe succinctly. In my opinion, it is the most complicated actuarial regulation that exists. The current version (8E) is the result of a long cat and mouse game between insurers and regulators and the ever increasing sophistication of ULSG. But fundamentally, it is trying to correct the same problem, which is the fact that the normal UL model reg method can be too easily gamed by ULSG product designs that result in unreasonably low solvency results from a regulator's perspective. So it prescribes a complicated methodology that results in a higher reserve. ULSG designs are difficult to comprehend without seeing them in action. They have a lot more moving parts than term and often make use of multiple account values (shadow accounts). Even within the different accounts, the charges and credits can shift around under different market conditions and other factors.

In theory, VM-20 (PBR) will obviate the need for these regulations and hopefully the complexity in ULSG design, which has been largely driven by AXXX regulation.

Learn how FSA exams are different from the prelims

We have your exam covered:

LP | LFV-U | LFV-C | LRM | ERM | QFI Core | QFI Adv | QFI IRM | G&H Core | G&H Adv | G&H Sp

Check out our Technical Skills Course and our new R Course!

Connect on Twitter, Facebook, & LinkedIn

Last edited by E; 06-16-2017 at 12:38 PM.. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2017, 02:25 PM
JMO Fan's Avatar
JMO Fan JMO Fan is offline
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: out in the woods
Favorite beer: Frostop Root
Posts: 4,869

AXXX (AG38) has become regulation via a non-government body (NAIC).
I thought this WAS a real job
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.17789 seconds with 9 queries