

FlashChat  Actuarial Discussion  Preliminary Exams  CAS/SOA Exams  Cyberchat  Around the World  Suggestions 

ShortTerm Actuarial Math Old Exam C Forum 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread  Display Modes 

#2




Quote:
Also, you can't get the credibility premium (Buhlmann?) without knowing the observations. Finally, you write the Bayesian estimate as a formula in "a" and "n", but previously wrote that a=4 once and a=50 another time and n=25. Might you look again at the problem and then carefully restate your question?
__________________
Jim Daniel Jim Daniel's Actuarial Seminars www.actuarialseminars.com jimdaniel@actuarialseminars.com 
#4




The data and answer still make little sense. Might you scan the printed version of the problem and "solution" and post it? I suspect you have typed some things incorrectly.
__________________
Jim Daniel Jim Daniel's Actuarial Seminars www.actuarialseminars.com jimdaniel@actuarialseminars.com 
Tags 
bayesian, bayesian premium, credibility premium, gamma 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Display Modes  

