Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > Finance - Investments
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


Finance - Investments Sub-forum: Non-Actuarial Personal Finance/Investing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-29-2017, 08:31 PM
jwyjang jwyjang is offline
SOA
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
College: Yonsei
Posts: 3
Default UIR(ultimate interest rate) of LICAT

Hi, I am recently studying about discount rate of Canada and found that there are huge differences b.w UIR of LICAT(Life Insurance Capital Adequacy Test) of Canada and UFR of Solvency2 of EIOPA.

Among the differences, what I am most wondering is that LICAT adopted spot rate as the ultimate rate but Solvency 2 adopted forward rate as the ultimate rate.

According to UIR of Canada, as OSFI adopted 4.5% spot rate, forward rate is significantly higher than UFR of Sol2 (3.5% forward rate). In addition, LICAT adopted 80bp of ultimate spread. It seems too high..

Is there anyone who knows the reason why OSFI decided to apply this high ultimate spot rate? Unlike the case of Sol2, I can't find any of documents why the rates has been decided so.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-30-2017, 08:27 AM
snikelfritz's Avatar
snikelfritz snikelfritz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yep
Studying for Nope
Favorite beer: Yep
Posts: 27,409
Default

The 80 bps spread is consistent with C-IFRS valuation actuarial standards http://www.cia-ica.ca/docs/default-s...14/214046e.pdf

The 4.5% looks like it's somewhere between C-IFRS Ultimate Reinvestment Rate low and median.

The stress scenario pulls 40 bps off the UIR.
__________________
The universe is a cruel uncaring void, the key to being happy isn't the search for meaning, it's to just keep yourself busy with unimportant nonsense and eventually, you'll be dead.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2017, 08:34 PM
jwyjang jwyjang is offline
SOA
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
College: Yonsei
Posts: 3
Default Thanks but still wondering..

snikelfrit.

Thanks to your comment and attached documents, I was able to understand brief concepts of methodologies.
But I still wonder why LICAT applied Spot rate instead of Forward rate.

The methods of calibration the rates between Sol2 and LICAT are very similar but the usage of the rates are different.
(Sol 2 > Ultimate forward rate, LICAT > Ultimate spot rate)

Anyone can help me??

----------------------------------
FYI,

Both are from macro economic point of view.

LICAT Calibration :

Historical Nominal Yield (Historical Real Yield + Historical Inflation) + Adjustment

Solvency 2 Calibration :

Real rate + expected inflation + Adjustment
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.17271 seconds with 11 queries