Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA/CAS Preliminary Exams > Exam 1/P - Probability
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Browse Open Actuarial Jobs

Life  Health  Casualty  Pension  Entry Level  All Jobs  Salaries


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-12-2018, 11:12 AM
aspringactuaryvp aspringactuaryvp is offline
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Default Actex Sufficient?

Hello, I am beginning study for Exam P. Is the Actex Study Manual and Practice Exams sufficient material to pass the exam, or are supplementary materials like ADAPT necessary?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2018, 01:05 AM
xplicitator xplicitator is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
College: SFU
Posts: 38
Default

I used both Actex and ADAPT for my studying. ADAPT is super helpful two weeks to a month before your exam where you can just constantly grind problems and it tells you where your weak points are so you can brush up those sections as well. I would say get yourself to at least a 5 or a 6 and you should be golden for the exam.
__________________
P, FM, MFE

VEE: Statistics, Economics, Corporate Finance
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-15-2018, 12:03 AM
Shakeela Shakeela is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
College: University of Waterloo Alumni
Posts: 271
Blog Entries: 1
Default

You can definitely pass with just ACTEX alone, along with other free practice questions available online.
__________________
Exam P & FM
Study Schedules --> Exam P - Exam FM
You pass or I pay your next $225 exam registration fee - Study Strategy Program for Exam P & FM.
--
Fellowship Exams
Exam Analysis Cheat Sheet - The #1 way to set your studying priorities (Shows you which readings are historically tested most often)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2018, 12:30 AM
redearedslider's Avatar
redearedslider redearedslider is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 13,167
Default

yes
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abraham Weishaus View Post
ASM does not have a discussion of stimulation, but considering how boring the manual is, maybe it would be a good idea.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2018, 03:32 PM
ricardoming7's Avatar
ricardoming7 ricardoming7 is offline
CAS SOA
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Mexico City
College: Faculty of Sciences UNAM
Posts: 21
Default

I don't mean to brag, but I scored a 10 on Exam P solely using Actex, SoA 240 and remembering what I learned in my probability courses from university.

So yes, it's enough. To increase your chances, review those as many times as you can.
__________________
Exams: P/1 | FM/2 | MFE/3F | C/4 | MLC |
VEE: Applied Statistics | Corporate Finance | Economics
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-18-2018, 05:12 PM
Michael Mastroianni's Avatar
Michael Mastroianni Michael Mastroianni is offline
SOA
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 8
Default

I also used Actex as my main study resource with I think only 154 SOA problems available at the time and scored a 10 on my first attempt. I supplemented this with a textbook from college to understand the theory better since many important concepts are not justified in the manual. In other words, the Actex manual has concise coverage of everything you need, but often lacks the underlying story that would convince you why everything works the way it does. There were some theoretical inaccuracies in the version I have (I don't know if fixed in later versions), but these were rare and unlikely to cause incorrect answers on the exam.

One of the main weaknesses of Actex is that, at least for the version I used, a large portion of the problems at the end of sections were word-for-word SOA sample problems so this made the SOA problems less useful after using the manual. They do have many original problems and a generous number of practice exams at the end of the manual as well though. The problems in the practice exams tend to be more detailed than actual exam problems so I think your speed doing those will be a poor indication of your speed on the exam. I remember I was taking about 2.5 hours on the Actex practice exams and passed the real exam in approximately 1.5 hours.

Overall I would recommend this manual as a solid resource and definitely consider it sufficient coupled with the SOA sample problems to pass the exam.

As an aside, I will be releasing a video course very soon teaching this material (anticipated to be available on or before April 1). The lessons have a focus on building intuition and making students comfortable with the "why" of everything. It also contains many original practice problems and video solutions. If you prefer videos (or want to supplement your manual with them) and want to really "get it" so you feel confident in your command of probability theory, this could be a great option for you.

Good luck with your studies aspringactuaryvp!
__________________
Michael Mastroianni, ASA
Video Course for Exam 1/P: www.probabilityexam.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-18-2018, 05:38 PM
Marcie's Avatar
Marcie Marcie is online now
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,431
Default

Don't mean to brag, but I didn't know there was such thing as study manuals when I scored a 10 on exam 1 (before it was called P, I think).

So, yes, any study manual is sufficient but not necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-18-2018, 05:50 PM
Actuarial Exams Actuarial Exams is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 130
Default

Exam P is so basic that any study manual is sufficient.

I used Finan and passed easily.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.36400 seconds with 11 queries