Actuarial Outpost Fractional Age Assumptions
 Register Blogs Wiki FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
 FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Search Actuarial Jobs by State @ DWSimpson.com:
AL AK AR AZ CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA
ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NH NJ NM NY NV NC ND
OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY

 Long-Term Actuarial Math Old Exam MLC Forum

#11
01-15-2019, 10:37 PM
 urbjhawk SOA Join Date: Oct 2017 Studying for LTAM Posts: 9

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Gandalf If you stop and think about it, you're asking a rather silly question. Fractional age assumptions are for the pattern of mortality between integral ages. So they tell you how to get (for example) mu_50.2 from q50. They wouldn't tell you how to get mu_51.2 (that's 50+1.2) from q50, because that's not in the year starting with age 50. You could say mu_(50+1.2)=mu_(51.2)=mu_(51+.2) and then evaluate it under udd by the formula you already gave as q_51/(1-.2*q_51).
Indeed it was, it has been a long day. Thanks for clearing up my confusion.
__________________
VEE's P FM SRM IFM STAM LTAM PA