Actuarial Outpost February 2019 Exam STAM Thread
 Register Blogs Wiki FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
 FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

 Enter your email to subscribe to DW Simpson weekly actuarial job updates. li.signup { display: block; text-align: center; text-size: .8; padding: 0px; margin: 8px; float: left; } Entry Level Casualty Health Life Pension All Jobs

 Short-Term Actuarial Math Old Exam C Forum

#1
10-19-2018, 12:13 PM
 harb1sj Member SOA Join Date: May 2017 Studying for STAM College: Central Michigan University Alumni Favorite beer: Two-Hearted Ale Posts: 30

Too early to start this thread? Just bought my CA bundle and ready to get started I've never had video lessons for exam prep, so hopefully this will be a bit easier than learning out of a book.
__________________
Introductory I: P | FM | VEE Economics | VEE Accounting and Finance
Introductory II: IFM | VEE Mathematical Statistics
Actuarial: LTAM | STAM | SRM
Professionalism: APC
#2
10-19-2018, 02:24 PM
 timmbo1987 Member SOA Join Date: Mar 2014 Studying for Global Conquest College: Ball State University, Alumni, M.A. Favorite beer: Coffee and more Coffee Posts: 108

I've been studying for this sitting for a month or so now. I am currently working through the manual, and i Just finished up Maximum Likelihood Estimators in ASM.
__________________
P/1, FM/2, MFE/3F, MLC/3L, STAM , PA
VEE Econ , VEE Stats , VEE Fin
FAP 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, I.A.,6, 7, 8, F.A.
#3
10-19-2018, 05:39 PM
 skysecond Member SOA Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: Dallas Studying for C College: UW-Madison Posts: 37

Just purchased CA bundle today. Study gets started from this weekend. Good luck to all!
__________________
P FM MFE STAM
#4
10-21-2018, 06:56 PM
 CaribbeanActuary SOA Join Date: Jan 2018 Posts: 6

For those of you that used/are using the ASM manual to study, I would like your advice. Are you aiming to complete every single one of the exercises? Or are you doing a limited number of questions from each exercise? If the latter, what is your general rule of thumb for how many questions you do from each exercise?

Also, how do you use the Supplementary Questions Sections? Do you complete these too?
#5
10-22-2018, 07:19 PM
 harb1sj Member SOA Join Date: May 2017 Studying for STAM College: Central Michigan University Alumni Favorite beer: Two-Hearted Ale Posts: 30

Quote:
 Originally Posted by CaribbeanActuary For those of you that used/are using the ASM manual to study, I would like your advice. Are you aiming to complete every single one of the exercises? Or are you doing a limited number of questions from each exercise? If the latter, what is your general rule of thumb for how many questions you do from each exercise?
While I am not using the ASM manual for this exam, when I have used paper manuals for previous exams I have started off by doing every exercise at the end of each section. As the exam drew closer in each case I had a better idea of what I needed to work on and how quickly I was catching on, so I skipped 1/4-1/2 of the questions in the later chapters. You will also know how much time you would like to be spending doing problems in the book vs. practice exams as you approach your test date.

I would say there is no strict rule of thumb, but go with your gut and your own perceived level of understanding.
__________________
Introductory I: P | FM | VEE Economics | VEE Accounting and Finance
Introductory II: IFM | VEE Mathematical Statistics
Actuarial: LTAM | STAM | SRM
Professionalism: APC
#6
10-22-2018, 08:24 PM
 CaribbeanActuary SOA Join Date: Jan 2018 Posts: 6

Quote:
 Originally Posted by harb1sj While I am not using the ASM manual for this exam, when I have used paper manuals for previous exams I have started off by doing every exercise at the end of each section. As the exam drew closer in each case I had a better idea of what I needed to work on and how quickly I was catching on, so I skipped 1/4-1/2 of the questions in the later chapters. You will also know how much time you would like to be spending doing problems in the book vs. practice exams as you approach your test date. I would say there is no strict rule of thumb, but go with your gut and your own perceived level of understanding.
I feel you on going "with your gut". After a number of prelims under our belts, you'd think we'd be pros at this by now lol...
#7
10-23-2018, 05:03 PM
 Jim Daniel Member SOA Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Davis, CA College: Wabash College B.A. 1962, Stanford Ph.D. 1965 Posts: 2,702
Face-to-face exam-prep seminar

Now that this thread is up and running, I thought I should post the same information here that I posted on the October-sitting thread---sorry for the duplication.

As usual, I'm offering my face-to-face exam-prep seminar for the February sitting. In order to avoid all the December/January holidays (and my professional obligations) and not get too close to the 8 February start of STAM's exam week, I have to offer it in the first half of December---namely 6 - 12 December. Since the SoA is not providing instant results for the October sitting and results won't be out until December, unfortunately October STAM takers won't know their results in time to take the seminar if they failed. I can't find a way to avoid this problem this year; it will go away again once instant results return for STAM. Soon, I hope!

Detailed information on the seminar---schedule, location, housing, registration, et cetera---can be found on my website http://www.actuarialseminars.com . Feel free to PM me with any questions that aren't answered on my website.
__________________
Jim Daniel
Jim Daniel's Actuarial Seminars
www.actuarialseminars.com
jimdaniel@actuarialseminars.com
#8
10-24-2018, 04:21 PM
 avanvalk SOA Join Date: May 2018 Location: Columbus, OH Studying for LTAM College: Ohio State University Posts: 3

Speaking as someone who took STAM this month (awaiting results), I felt that the CA instructional videos and ADAPT prepared me quite well for the exam. The look and feel of the questions on the exam were very similar to what I saw in my practice problems (even the never-before-tested material like loss reserving/ratemaking). Obviously, I don't know for sure yet, but I felt good about it, and I'll be surprised if I failed, and CA was the entirety of my prep material.
#9
10-24-2018, 05:26 PM
 timmbo1987 Member SOA Join Date: Mar 2014 Studying for Global Conquest College: Ball State University, Alumni, M.A. Favorite beer: Coffee and more Coffee Posts: 108

Quote:
 Originally Posted by avanvalk Speaking as someone who took STAM this month (awaiting results), I felt that the CA instructional videos and ADAPT prepared me quite well for the exam. The look and feel of the questions on the exam were very similar to what I saw in my practice problems (even the never-before-tested material like loss reserving/ratemaking). Obviously, I don't know for sure yet, but I felt good about it, and I'll be surprised if I failed, and CA was the entirety of my prep material.
In your opinion, would the textbook (Rate Making and Loss Reserving for Property and Casualty Insurance), in addition to ADAPT be adequate in preparation for the newly added material? I have the 18th edition of ASM for Exam C. So, I figured with that, the textbook, ADAPT, and the Sample MC questions, I would have more than enough to prepare for the February sitting.
__________________
P/1, FM/2, MFE/3F, MLC/3L, STAM , PA
VEE Econ , VEE Stats , VEE Fin
FAP 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, I.A.,6, 7, 8, F.A.
#10
10-25-2018, 11:49 AM
 avanvalk SOA Join Date: May 2018 Location: Columbus, OH Studying for LTAM College: Ohio State University Posts: 3

Quote:
 Originally Posted by timmbo1987 In your opinion, would the textbook (Rate Making and Loss Reserving for Property and Casualty Insurance), in addition to ADAPT be adequate in preparation for the newly added material? I have the 18th edition of ASM for Exam C. So, I figured with that, the textbook, ADAPT, and the Sample MC questions, I would have more than enough to prepare for the February sitting.
I honestly didn't actually buy the textbook, so I'm not able to give an informed opinion on it, but it sounds like that should be enough. I actually took C in June and got a 5, and I felt like this sitting was easier with the new material and taking out some of the stuff from C (I struggled with kernel smoothing and simulation - survival and hazard rate estimators got moved to LTAM, but I thought those were pretty straightforward). The sample SOA questions are really good - I thought several of the questions I got on the exam were very similar to things I had seen and done on the SOA sample questions.