Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Actuarial Discussion Forum > General Actuarial
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions


General Actuarial Non-Specific Actuarial Topics - Before posting a thread, please browse over our other sections to see if there is a better fit, such as Careers - Employment, Actuarial Science Universities Forum or any of our other 100+ forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2018, 11:55 AM
fastcount fastcount is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 148
Default MG-Alfa vs GGY AXIS

Does anyone have experience with both?
Is it easy to go from one to the other?

Is it similar to how the first computer programming language is usually the hardest, and then learning the 2nd language is much easier?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-25-2018, 12:04 PM
ronaldy27's Avatar
ronaldy27 ronaldy27 is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 'Murica
Studying for the credential
Posts: 3,056
Default

I personally don't have any experience with either but I worked for a company (and Im sure there are many others) that was going through a transition, completely moving from MG Alfa to GGY AXIS. People who used it said how inefficient MG ALFA was and going into Axis was good.

As for ease of learning, I can't give any input.
__________________
Spoiler - for size:



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2018, 12:41 PM
fastcount fastcount is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 148
Default

Hmm, is GGY AXIS the gold standard for valuation software?

I have a friend in Canada who told me that pretty much all insurance/reinsurance companies and even banks, they all use GGY AXIS.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-25-2018, 01:54 PM
JMO's Avatar
JMO JMO is offline
Carol Marler
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Back home again in Indiana
Studying for Nothing actuarial.
Posts: 37,540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastcount View Post
Hmm, is GGY AXIS the gold standard for valuation software?

I have a friend in Canada who told me that pretty much all insurance/reinsurance companies and even banks, they all use GGY AXIS.
GGY is a Canadian product. It's not the market leader in the US.
__________________
Carol Marler, "Just My Opinion"

Pluto is no longer a planet and I am no longer an actuary. Please take my opinions as non-actuarial.


My latest favorite quotes, updated Apr 5, 2018.

Spoiler:
I should keep these four permanently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rekrap View Post
JMO is right
Quote:
Originally Posted by campbell View Post
I agree with JMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westley View Post
And def agree w/ JMO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MG View Post
This. And everything else JMO wrote.
And this all purpose permanent quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr T Non-Fan View Post
Yup, it is always someone else's fault.
MORE:
All purpose response for careers forum:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctorNo View Post
Depends upon the employer and the situation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sredni Vashtar View Post
I feel like ERM is 90% buzzwords, and that the underlying agenda is to make sure at least one of your Corporate Officers is not dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2018, 02:34 PM
MG's Avatar
MG MG is offline
Member
SOA AAA
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,903
Default

I've worked a lot with MG-Alfa. I like the flexibility, the ability to drill down and create and modify coding as needed, and the responsiveness of the vendor support staff.

I have not directly worked with GGY-Axis, but I've seen a couple demos/presentations. It seems to be much more black box than MG-Alfa, and any customizations or mods must be made by the vendor, and it's not clear how quick the turnaround would be on that. At one point I recall it was more costly as well, but I'm not sure if that's still true.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2018, 03:52 PM
fastcount fastcount is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 148
Default

I'm not sure about the cost either.

But if there's no way to model a certain product feature, it'll take roughly a few months before the vendor installs the functionality into the software.

But they've gotten quite good, you can specify formula sections where you can write your own code. It doesn't always work, but a lot of the things can be accomplished by the user directly.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-01-2018, 10:26 AM
trueblade's Avatar
trueblade trueblade is offline
Member
CAS
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Castlevania
Studying for Freedom
Posts: 902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastcount View Post
Hmm, is GGY AXIS the gold standard for valuation software?

I have a friend in Canada who told me that pretty much all insurance/reinsurance companies and even banks, they all use GGY AXIS.
Bank owned insurance companies use GGY AXIS, but not the banks themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-01-2018, 11:17 AM
whoanonstop's Avatar
whoanonstop whoanonstop is offline
Member
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Studying for Spark / Scala
College: College of William and Mary
Favorite beer: Orange Juice
Posts: 5,865
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fastcount View Post
But if there's no way to model a certain product feature, it'll take roughly a few months before the vendor installs the functionality into the software.
But the softwares motto is "Built for the future, ready today"

So how can what you are saying be correct?!

-Riley
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.22249 seconds with 9 queries