Actuarial Outpost
 
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > Exams - General
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

2017 ACTUARIAL SALARY SURVEYS
Contact DW Simpson for a Personalized Salary Survey

Exams - General Sub-fora: CFA exams
Non-specific topics and complaint department

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-29-2015, 04:57 PM
Hootja Hootja is offline
Non-Actuary
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Iowa
College: University of Notre Dame alumni
Posts: 11
Default Necessary to review syllabuses of past/passed exams?

Hello everyone, I'm new to these forums and to most things actuarial. I graduated this past May and only after I graduated did I think to pursue a degree as an actuary, so really I don't know tons of details about anything related to the field yet.

One of my majors in college was Math, so after I learned a little bit about actuaries I decided to jump right into exam taking. I started studying for Exam P in mid June and I was able to pass the exam on July 27th. I plan to attempt Exam FM in October.

Now that I've passed Exam P, should I/do I need to revisit the material on the syllabus every now and then to keep it fresh? Or should I just move on and focus 100% on the FM syllabus?

I realize there could be some overlaps with future exams and that knowledge of the Exam P syllabus could be necessary for future exams, so maybe I shouldn't worry about this and just focus on the next exam.

This concern only came to mind because I, admittedly, didn't put a ton of time into studying for P. I actually felt like I wasn't going to pass it a few days prior to the exam, and did some hard-core cramming of the multi-variables stuff a few days prior to taking the exam as a last ditch effort. Luckily I'm a pretty good test taker and I managed to pass. I feel like I have, at least, a basic understanding of everything that was on the syllabus, but the multi-variables stuff could definitely be a lot better. Because I relied on cramming, I feel like my knowledge of the syllabus material might not last long without reinforcement through studying.

Should I be worried about my probability skills dwindling as I move on to future exams? Or is there no reason to worry about this since, perhaps, probability will necessarily be reinforced/revisited on future exams? Any advice you provide this newbie is much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-29-2015, 05:07 PM
Childish Gambino's Avatar
Childish Gambino Childish Gambino is offline
Member
SOA
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 24,342
Default

There will be overlap. Concepts from P will come up again on MLC and C but there is no need to review. You won't need to have al the distributions memorized again for example. The larger ideas you will need but you should be able to retain them without doing any actual work.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pseudolus View Post
Trump's biggest weakness is that he utterly lacks the knowledge, experience, interest, attention span, temperament, and common decency to be the marginally effective President of a reasonably-large HOA.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.12315 seconds with 11 queries