Actuarial Outpost
Go Back   Actuarial Outpost > Exams - Please Limit Discussion to Exam-Related Topics > SoA > Modules 6-8
FlashChat Actuarial Discussion Preliminary Exams CAS/SOA Exams Cyberchat Around the World Suggestions

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-09-2018, 05:48 PM
Mihar123 Mihar123 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2018
College: Texas A&M University Alumni
Posts: 8

What type of changes are we supposed to recommend? Is the question simply asking us to determine if x assumption should "increase" or are we do need to be more specific and explain how exactly it needs to be changed, x assumption should increase to y%?
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2018, 05:53 PM
Charlie the Unicorn's Avatar
Charlie the Unicorn Charlie the Unicorn is offline
Join Date: Dec 2016
Studying for money to buy dogs
College: Candy Mountain Alumnus
Posts: 51

I did the latter and passed.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2018, 04:01 PM
actuary28 actuary28 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 44

Originally Posted by Charlie the Unicorn View Post
I did the latter and passed.
how did you determine the magnitude?

Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2018, 01:17 AM
noone noone is offline
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 100

This seems like the easiest task yet this task was called out on my second fail. For each assumption I
- Made an observation on how the experience differed from the model
- based on the above observation I recommended an increase, decrease or no change to the assumption
- I quantified my recommended change and provided a percentage increase or decrease to the recommended tax
- I also mentioned the overall impact to the tax based on all changes.
An example might be something like, "The experience shows that there were 300k less persons employed over the previous 5 year period. Considering a recommended tax of 750 per person, this resulted in a loss of 225m. Due to this observation I recommend that the model be adjusted so that the employed persons assumption is reduced by 50k a year. This will result in the recommended tax increasing by approximately 10%."

Also what reports did you use what will provide a warning? I am not really sure what they mean by "warning". If this report had been implemented at the start, how would it of warned us of the poor experience that we saw over the first 5 years? If your annual return was -15% for one year is that a warning that your fund sucks or just normal volatility that you will expect to see over a 30 year period?

And you can't really produce a report that measures inflation or provides employment statistics. These will have to be provided by the government. I mentioned this in addition to other reports.

I think this question is supposed to bring it full circle with respect to the actuarial control cycle but I guess I was not able to demonstrate that I understood this.

I would appreciate your take.

Last edited by noone; 12-14-2018 at 01:19 AM.. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote

cdef, task 6

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
*PLEASE NOTE: Posts are not checked for accuracy, and do not
represent the views of the Actuarial Outpost or its sponsors.
Page generated in 0.15890 seconds with 11 queries